OTGL vs. DBO
OTGL (OTG Latin America ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - OTGL is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. OTGL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
OTGL vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OTGL achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 43.93% return.
OTGL
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 6M
- 4.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- -4.15%
- 1M
- -21.96%
- YTD
- 43.93%
- 6M
- 41.96%
- 1Y
- 37.25%
- 3Y*
- 12.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.76%
OTGL vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF | 4.23% | 13.64% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 43.93% | -9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between OTGL and DBO is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OTGL vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
OTGL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DBO
OTGL vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OTG Latin America ETF (OTGL) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OTGL | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.43 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.33 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OTGL vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OTGL drawdown since its inception was -13.52%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTGL and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OTGL | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -90.18% | +76.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.18% | -62.12% | +51.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.34% | -62.22% | +58.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.63% | — |
Volatility
OTGL vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OTGL | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.23% | 34.63% | -15.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 32.59% | -13.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 31.84% | -12.61% |
OTGL vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
OTGL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
OTGL vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
OTGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than DBO's 2.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 2.44% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF | 2.86% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OTGL and DBO have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OTGL.
OTGL has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 2.44% for DBO.
OTGL is categorized as Latin America Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. OTGL tracks Actively Managed, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: OTG and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OTGL and 0.78% for DBO.
Find the right allocation for OTGL and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer