OTGL vs. BSCQ
OTGL (OTG Latin America ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OTGL is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while BSCQ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. OTGL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCQ.
Performance
OTGL vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OTGL achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly higher than BSCQ's 1.68% return.
OTGL
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 6.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSCQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 4.21%
- 3Y*
- 5.17%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- —
OTGL vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF | 5.36% | 13.64% |
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.68% | 2.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between OTGL and BSCQ is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OTGL vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank
OTGL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BSCQ
OTGL vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OTG Latin America ETF (OTGL) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OTGL | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 3.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 41.36 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 181.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OTGL vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OTGL drawdown since its inception was -13.52%, smaller than the maximum BSCQ drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTGL and BSCQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OTGL | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -16.50% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.20% | -0.03% | -9.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -2.83% | -0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.02% | — |
Volatility
OTGL vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OTGL | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.23% | 0.61% | +18.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 3.29% | +15.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 4.75% | +14.48% |
OTGL vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
OTGL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
OTGL vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison
OTGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than BSCQ's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.11% | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 2.92% | 0.51% |
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF | 2.83% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OTGL and BSCQ have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OTGL.
BSCQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 2.83% for OTGL.
OTGL is categorized as Latin America Equities, while BSCQ is Corporate Bonds. OTGL tracks Actively Managed, while BSCQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. They also come from different issuers: OTG and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OTGL and 0.10% for BSCQ.
Find the right allocation for OTGL and BSCQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer