PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OTCKX vs. SMCWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OTCKX vs. SMCWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (OTCKX) and American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OTCKX achieves a 4.99% return, which is significantly lower than SMCWX's 12.78% return. Over the past 10 years, OTCKX has outperformed SMCWX with an annualized return of 12.88%, while SMCWX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.96% annualized return.


OTCKX

1D
0.57%
1M
3.79%
YTD
4.99%
6M
3.62%
1Y
4.66%
3Y*
15.51%
5Y*
6.61%
10Y*
12.88%

SMCWX

1D
0.63%
1M
2.81%
YTD
12.78%
6M
13.38%
1Y
25.58%
3Y*
12.91%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OTCKX vs. SMCWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OTCKX
MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6
4.99%3.75%26.48%21.50%-28.29%14.09%35.81%37.93%1.19%26.35%
SMCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A
12.78%14.07%2.33%18.86%-29.90%10.14%37.46%30.79%-9.75%26.85%

Correlation

The correlation between OTCKX and SMCWX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.88

The correlation between OTCKX and SMCWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OTCKX vs. SMCWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OTCKX
OTCKX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
OTCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OTCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
OTCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
OTCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
OTCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SMCWX
SMCWX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SMCWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCWX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCWX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OTCKX vs. SMCWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (OTCKX) and American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OTCKXSMCWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.30

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

2.23

-1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.86

8.94

-8.08

OTCKX vs. SMCWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OTCKX Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the SMCWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OTCKX and SMCWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OTCKXSMCWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

1.67

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.12

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.56

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.59

+0.02

Drawdowns

OTCKX vs. SMCWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OTCKX drawdown since its inception was -36.64%, smaller than the maximum SMCWX drawdown of -62.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTCKX and SMCWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OTCKXSMCWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.64%

-62.46%

+25.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.31%

-11.83%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.99%

-21.40%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.64%

-39.79%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.64%

-39.79%

+3.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

-0.49%

-2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.36%

-14.92%

+7.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.29%

2.95%

+3.34%

Volatility

OTCKX vs. SMCWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (OTCKX) is 4.21%, while American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that OTCKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMCWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OTCKXSMCWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

5.09%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.34%

12.83%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.54%

15.82%

+0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.37%

18.20%

+2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.07%

17.90%

+2.17%

OTCKX vs. SMCWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OTCKX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than SMCWX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

OTCKX vs. SMCWX - Dividend Comparison

OTCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.18%, more than SMCWX's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OTCKX
MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6
14.18%14.88%16.85%0.00%0.00%3.35%0.77%0.81%4.40%8.28%5.38%2.72%
SMCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A
4.30%4.84%0.60%0.64%0.00%9.24%1.60%4.24%7.06%4.48%0.35%6.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


OTCKX and SMCWX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMCWX has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to OTCKX (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OTCKX dropped -36.64% vs SMCWX's -62.46%.

SMCWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OTCKX and SMCWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer