OTCKX vs. MMGPX
OTCKX (MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6) and MMGPX (Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, OTCKX returned 5.21%/yr vs -6.35%/yr for MMGPX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OTCKX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for MMGPX.
Performance
OTCKX vs. MMGPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OTCKX achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly higher than MMGPX's 2.60% return.
OTCKX
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 2.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 5.21%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
MMGPX
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- 6M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 2.60%
- 1Y
- -3.73%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- -6.35%
- 10Y*
- —
OTCKX vs. MMGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTCKX MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | 5.49% | 3.75% | 26.48% | 21.50% | -28.29% | 14.09% | 35.81% | 37.93% | 1.19% | 23.06% |
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 2.60% | 12.58% | 41.83% | 44.34% | -63.37% | -11.55% | 152.67% | 40.20% | 10.89% | 28.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between OTCKX and MMGPX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.78 |
The correlation between OTCKX and MMGPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OTCKX vs. MMGPX — Risk / Return Rank
OTCKX
MMGPX
OTCKX vs. MMGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (OTCKX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OTCKX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.99 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | -0.19 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | -0.37 | +0.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OTCKX vs. MMGPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OTCKX drawdown since its inception was -36.64%, smaller than the maximum MMGPX drawdown of -75.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTCKX and MMGPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OTCKX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.64% | -75.38% | +38.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.31% | -27.79% | +11.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.99% | -29.27% | +8.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.64% | -72.70% | +36.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.41% | -38.69% | +36.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.32% | -30.34% | +23.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.37% | 13.99% | -7.62% |
Volatility
OTCKX vs. MMGPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (OTCKX) is 6.14%, while Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a volatility of 7.19%. This indicates that OTCKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OTCKX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.14% | 7.19% | -1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.34% | 21.67% | -7.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.49% | 28.47% | -10.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.54% | 39.82% | -19.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.09% | 35.16% | -15.07% |
OTCKX vs. MMGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OTCKX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MMGPX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
OTCKX vs. MMGPX - Dividend Comparison
OTCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.11%, while MMGPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 125.40% | 64.53% | 7.93% | 15.63% | 28.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OTCKX MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | 14.11% | 14.88% | 16.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.35% | 0.77% | 0.81% | 4.40% | 8.28% | 5.38% | 2.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OTCKX and MMGPX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMGPX has higher volatility (7.19%) compared to OTCKX (6.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OTCKX dropped -36.64% vs MMGPX's -75.38%.
OTCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OTCKX and MMGPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer