OSK vs. PH
OSK (Oshkosh Corporation) and PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — OSK in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery, PH in Specialty Industrial Machinery. Over the past 10 years, OSK returned 13.31%/yr vs 25.12%/yr for PH. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OSK vs. PH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OSK achieves a 8.34% return, which is significantly higher than PH's 3.21% return. Over the past 10 years, OSK has underperformed PH with an annualized return of 13.31%, while PH has yielded a comparatively higher 25.12% annualized return.
OSK
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 8.25%
- YTD
- 8.34%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 23.26%
- 3Y*
- 18.82%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 13.31%
PH
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 3.21%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 36.66%
- 3Y*
- 36.33%
- 5Y*
- 26.12%
- 10Y*
- 25.12%
OSK vs. PH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OSK Oshkosh Corporation | 8.34% | 34.49% | -10.83% | 25.23% | -20.49% | 32.52% | -7.53% | 56.59% | -31.62% | 42.35% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 3.21% | 39.54% | 39.58% | 60.81% | -6.91% | 18.30% | 34.78% | 40.75% | -24.00% | 44.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between OSK and PH is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, OSK and PH have become more correlated (0.62) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
OSK:
$64.40B
PH:
$115.65B
OSK:
$2.08
PH:
$27.11
OSK:
65.02
PH:
33.33
OSK:
1.36
PH:
1.41
OSK:
3.60
PH:
5.53
OSK:
6.47
PH:
7.43
OSK:
$10.43B
PH:
$20.99B
OSK:
$1.42B
PH:
$7.81B
OSK:
$1.04B
PH:
$5.31B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OSK vs. PH — Risk / Return Rank
OSK
PH
OSK vs. PH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OSK | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.26 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | 1.90 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.87 | 5.64 | -3.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OSK vs. PH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OSK drawdown since its inception was -93.84%, which is greater than PH's maximum drawdown of -66.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSK and PH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OSK | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.84% | -66.92% | -26.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.06% | -19.34% | -13.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.66% | -26.79% | -9.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.96% | -28.64% | -15.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.68% | -54.68% | +6.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.77% | -11.49% | -12.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.21% | -15.33% | -7.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.50% | 6.52% | +5.98% |
Volatility
OSK vs. PH - Volatility Comparison
Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) has a higher volatility of 12.35% compared to Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) at 7.58%. This indicates that OSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OSK | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.35% | 7.58% | +4.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.21% | 18.96% | +12.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.67% | 25.10% | +13.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.39% | 28.68% | +5.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.33% | 31.70% | +3.63% |
Dividends
OSK vs. PH - Dividend Comparison
OSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than PH's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OSK Oshkosh Corporation | 1.60% | 1.62% | 1.94% | 1.51% | 1.68% | 1.21% | 1.43% | 1.17% | 1.61% | 0.96% | 1.21% | 1.74% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.82% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
Financials
OSK vs. PH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Oshkosh Corporation and Parker-Hannifin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OSK vs. PH - Profitability Comparison
OSK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Oshkosh Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 5.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
OSK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Oshkosh Corporation reported an operating income of 82.00M and revenue of 2.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.5%.
PH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
OSK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Oshkosh Corporation reported a net income of 43.10M and revenue of 2.32B, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.
PH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 904.00M and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OSK and PH have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OSK has higher volatility (12.35%) compared to PH (7.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSK dropped -93.84% vs PH's -66.92%.
PH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OSK and PH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer