OSCV vs. JANB
OSCV (Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF) and JANB (Aptus January Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OSCV is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors, while JANB is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors. Both are actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OSCV charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JANB.
Performance
OSCV vs. JANB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OSCV achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly higher than JANB's 5.32% return.
OSCV
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 12.19%
- 6M
- 10.21%
- 1Y
- 16.60%
- 3Y*
- 11.76%
- 5Y*
- 6.15%
- 10Y*
- —
JANB
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OSCV vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF | 12.19% | 0.09% |
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF | 5.32% | 2.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between OSCV and JANB is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OSCV vs. JANB — Risk / Return Rank
OSCV
JANB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OSCV vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OSCV | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.42 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OSCV vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OSCV drawdown since its inception was -42.40%, which is greater than JANB's maximum drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSCV and JANB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OSCV | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.40% | -6.52% | -35.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.97% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.56% | -1.10% | -6.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | — | — |
Volatility
OSCV vs. JANB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OSCV | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.36% | 7.51% | +5.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 7.51% | +9.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 7.51% | +13.34% |
OSCV vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison
OSCV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
OSCV vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison
OSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, while JANB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.29% | 1.55% | 1.12% | 1.06% | 1.11% | 1.75% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OSCV and JANB have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OSCV.
OSCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.00% for JANB.
OSCV is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while JANB is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OSCV and 0.25% for JANB.
Find the right allocation for OSCV and JANB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer