OSCV vs. APRB
OSCV (Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF) and APRB (Aptus April Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OSCV is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors, while APRB is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors. Both are actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OSCV charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for APRB.
Performance
OSCV vs. APRB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OSCV achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly higher than APRB's 4.88% return.
OSCV
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 9.18%
- 6M
- 8.64%
- 1Y
- 15.66%
- 3Y*
- 10.33%
- 5Y*
- 5.36%
- 10Y*
- —
APRB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 4.88%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OSCV vs. APRB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF | 9.18% | -1.45% |
APRB Aptus April Buffer ETF | 4.88% | 2.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between OSCV and APRB is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OSCV vs. APRB — Risk / Return Rank
OSCV
APRB
OSCV vs. APRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OSCV | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.83 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.97 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OSCV | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 2.04 | -1.68 |
Drawdowns
OSCV vs. APRB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OSCV drawdown since its inception was -42.40%, which is greater than APRB's maximum drawdown of -4.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSCV and APRB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OSCV | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.40% | -4.59% | -37.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | 0.00% | -2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.60% | -0.75% | -6.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | — | — |
Volatility
OSCV vs. APRB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OSCV | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.43% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.35% | 5.99% | +7.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 5.99% | +11.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 5.99% | +14.92% |
OSCV vs. APRB - Expense Ratio Comparison
OSCV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than APRB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
OSCV vs. APRB - Dividend Comparison
OSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, while APRB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APRB Aptus April Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF | 1.10% | 1.23% | 1.29% | 1.55% | 1.12% | 1.06% | 1.11% | 1.75% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OSCV and APRB have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OSCV.
OSCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.00% for APRB.
OSCV is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while APRB is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OSCV and 0.25% for APRB.
Find the right allocation for OSCV and APRB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer