OSCV vs. ADME

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

OSCV (Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF) and ADME (Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OSCV is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors, while ADME is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the Aptus Behavioral Momentum Index. OSCV is actively managed, while ADME is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OSCV returned 6.15%/yr vs 7.44%/yr for ADME. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

OSCV vs. ADME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) and Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OSCV achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly higher than ADME's 7.37% return.

OSCV

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 2.09%
• YTD: 12.19%
• 6M: 10.21%
• 1Y: 16.60%
• 3Y*: 11.76%
• 5Y*: 6.15%
• 10Y*: —

ADME

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: -1.31%
• YTD: 7.37%
• 6M: 6.36%
• 1Y: 17.42%
• 3Y*: 16.12%
• 5Y*: 7.44%
• 10Y*: 8.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OSCV vs. ADME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF	12.19%	1.35%	11.66%	10.14%	-11.41%	27.69%	4.94%	27.51%	-13.57%
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF	7.37%	10.28%	22.11%	15.42%	-21.80%	20.24%	18.21%	9.31%	-18.72%

Correlation

The correlation between OSCV and ADME is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018	0.66

The correlation between OSCV and ADME shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

OSCV vs. ADME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OSCV

OSCV Risk / Return Rank: 41
OSCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
OSCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
OSCV Omega Ratio Rank: 34
OSCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
OSCV Martin Ratio Rank: 42

ADME

ADME Risk / Return Rank: 51
ADME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
ADME Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
ADME Omega Ratio Rank: 48
ADME Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
ADME Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OSCV vs. ADME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) and Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OSCV	ADME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.64	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	2.30	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.29	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	2.34	-0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.42	9.68	-3.26

OSCV vs. ADME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OSCV Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the ADME Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OSCV and ADME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OSCV vs. ADME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSCV drawdown since its inception was -42.40%, which is greater than ADME's maximum drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSCV and ADME.

Drawdown Indicators

	OSCV	ADME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.40%	-27.49%	-14.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.55%	-7.49%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.92%	-15.67%	-7.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.92%	-23.43%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-2.93%	+2.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.56%	-7.89%	+0.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	1.80%	+0.79%

Volatility

OSCV vs. ADME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) is 2.97%, while Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that OSCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OSCV	ADME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.97%	4.57%	-1.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.47%	8.63%	+0.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.36%	10.73%	+2.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.22%	13.00%	+4.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.85%	14.45%	+6.40%

OSCV vs. ADME - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OSCV and ADME have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

OSCV vs. ADME - Dividend Comparison

OSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than ADME's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF	0.38%	0.38%	0.47%	0.78%	0.73%	0.26%	0.41%	0.70%	0.86%	0.32%	0.69%
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF	1.07%	1.23%	1.29%	1.55%	1.12%	1.06%	1.11%	1.75%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OSCV and ADME in my portfolio?

OSCV and ADME have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OSCV or ADME?

ADME has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to OSCV (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSCV dropped -42.40% vs ADME's -27.49%.

Which ETF is better, OSCV or ADME?

On 5-year performance, ADME leads with 7.44% vs 6.15% for OSCV. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, OSCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OSCV or ADME?

Over the 5-year period, ADME has performed better with a 7.44% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OSCV or ADME?

OSCV and ADME have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OSCV or ADME?

OSCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.38% for ADME.

What is the main difference between OSCV and ADME?

OSCV is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while ADME is Hedge Fund.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ADME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.