OSCV vs. ADME
OSCV (Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF) and ADME (Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OSCV is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors, while ADME is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the Aptus Behavioral Momentum Index. OSCV is actively managed, while ADME is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OSCV returned 5.36%/yr vs 8.56%/yr for ADME. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
OSCV vs. ADME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OSCV achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly lower than ADME's 10.61% return.
OSCV
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 9.18%
- 6M
- 8.64%
- 1Y
- 15.66%
- 3Y*
- 10.33%
- 5Y*
- 5.36%
- 10Y*
- —
ADME
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 10.61%
- 6M
- 9.92%
- 1Y
- 22.34%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.56%
- 10Y*
- —
OSCV vs. ADME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF | 9.18% | 1.35% | 11.66% | 10.14% | -11.41% | 27.69% | 4.94% | 27.51% | -13.52% |
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 10.61% | 10.28% | 22.11% | 15.42% | -21.80% | 20.24% | 18.21% | 9.31% | -18.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between OSCV and ADME is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018 | 0.66 |
The correlation between OSCV and ADME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
OSCV vs. ADME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OSCV
ADME
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
OSCV
ADME
Industrials
OSCV
ADME
Energy
OSCV
ADME
Consumer Cyclical
OSCV
ADME
Real Estate
OSCV
ADME
Healthcare
OSCV
ADME
Basic Materials
OSCV
ADME
Utilities
OSCV
ADME
Consumer Defensive
OSCV
ADME
Technology
OSCV
ADME
Communication Services
OSCV
-
ADME
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OSCV vs. ADME — Risk / Return Rank
OSCV
ADME
OSCV vs. ADME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) and Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OSCV | ADME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 2.26 | -1.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.83 | 3.21 | -1.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.40 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 3.02 | -1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.97 | 13.22 | -7.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OSCV | ADME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 2.26 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.67 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.63 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
OSCV vs. ADME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OSCV drawdown since its inception was -42.40%, which is greater than ADME's maximum drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSCV and ADME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OSCV | ADME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.40% | -27.49% | -14.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.55% | -7.49% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.92% | -15.67% | -7.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.92% | -23.43% | +0.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | 0.00% | -2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.60% | -7.92% | +0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 1.71% | +0.84% |
Volatility
OSCV vs. ADME - Volatility Comparison
Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) at 2.93%. This indicates that OSCV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OSCV | ADME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 2.93% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.43% | 7.67% | +1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.35% | 9.92% | +3.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 12.87% | +4.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 14.40% | +6.51% |
OSCV vs. ADME - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both OSCV and ADME have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
OSCV vs. ADME - Dividend Comparison
OSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than ADME's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 0.37% | 0.38% | 0.47% | 0.78% | 0.73% | 0.26% | 0.41% | 0.70% | 0.86% | 0.32% | 0.69% |
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF | 1.10% | 1.23% | 1.29% | 1.55% | 1.12% | 1.06% | 1.11% | 1.75% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OSCV and ADME have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OSCV has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to ADME (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSCV dropped -42.40% vs ADME's -27.49%.
On 5-year performance, ADME leads with 8.56% vs 5.36% for OSCV. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, ADME has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ADME has performed better with a 8.56% return vs 5.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OSCV and ADME have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
OSCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.37% for ADME.
OSCV is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while ADME is Hedge Fund.
ADME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OSCV and ADME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer