PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OSCBX vs. PZRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OSCBX vs. PZRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Overseas SMA Completion Portfolio (OSCBX) and PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OSCBX achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly lower than PZRIX's 15.07% return.


OSCBX

1D
0.65%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
2.47%
6M
4.46%
1Y
22.81%
3Y*
20.38%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*

PZRIX

1D
0.31%
1M
2.37%
YTD
15.07%
6M
17.95%
1Y
34.46%
3Y*
21.22%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
10.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OSCBX vs. PZRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
OSCBX
Overseas SMA Completion Portfolio
2.47%47.21%6.06%15.00%-11.51%6.10%7.40%11.03%
PZRIX
PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund
15.07%34.05%3.29%19.31%-9.11%12.08%1.74%6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between OSCBX and PZRIX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2019

0.88

The correlation between OSCBX and PZRIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OSCBX vs. PZRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OSCBX
OSCBX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
OSCBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OSCBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
OSCBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
OSCBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
OSCBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

PZRIX
PZRIX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PZRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PZRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OSCBX vs. PZRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overseas SMA Completion Portfolio (OSCBX) and PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OSCBXPZRIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

2.96

-1.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.08

3.97

-1.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.53

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

4.17

-2.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.91

15.05

-10.14

OSCBX vs. PZRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OSCBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the PZRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OSCBX and PZRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OSCBXPZRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

2.96

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.66

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.61

-0.02

Drawdowns

OSCBX vs. PZRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSCBX drawdown since its inception was -39.50%, smaller than the maximum PZRIX drawdown of -43.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSCBX and PZRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OSCBXPZRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.50%

-43.53%

+4.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.34%

-8.18%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.34%

-13.81%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.93%

-30.85%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.25%

-0.76%

-6.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.29%

-8.89%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.35%

2.26%

+2.09%

Volatility

OSCBX vs. PZRIX - Volatility Comparison

Overseas SMA Completion Portfolio (OSCBX) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX) at 3.09%. This indicates that OSCBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PZRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OSCBXPZRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

3.09%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.90%

8.89%

+3.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.88%

11.54%

+3.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

15.78%

+0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.10%

16.94%

+2.16%

OSCBX vs. PZRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OSCBX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PZRIX's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

OSCBX vs. PZRIX - Dividend Comparison

OSCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than PZRIX's 5.70% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
OSCBX
Overseas SMA Completion Portfolio
2.82%2.89%6.48%5.66%3.86%6.86%1.42%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PZRIX
PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund
5.70%6.56%6.70%9.19%8.80%11.99%2.04%6.32%2.80%4.13%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


OSCBX and PZRIX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OSCBX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to PZRIX (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSCBX dropped -39.50% vs PZRIX's -43.53%.

PZRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OSCBX and PZRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer