ORR vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ORR (Militia Long/Short Equity ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ORR is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Militia Investments, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ORR returned 24.69% vs 2.87% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. ORR charges 14.19%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

ORR vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Militia Long/Short Equity ETF (ORR) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ORR achieves a 4.80% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.18% return.

ORR

• 1D: -2.08%
• 1M: -1.16%
• YTD: 4.80%
• 6M: 4.56%
• 1Y: 24.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.29%
• 1Y: 2.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ORR vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ORR Militia Long/Short Equity ETF	4.80%	31.99%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.18%	3.08%

Correlation

The correlation between ORR and BAMU is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

ORR vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ORR

ORR Risk / Return Rank: 50
ORR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
ORR Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
ORR Omega Ratio Rank: 49
ORR Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
ORR Martin Ratio Rank: 40

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ORR vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Militia Long/Short Equity ETF (ORR) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ORR	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	4.94	-3.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	8.71	-6.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	2.41	-1.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	24.37	-21.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.10	96.52	-90.43

ORR vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ORR Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ORR and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ORR vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ORR drawdown since its inception was -9.90%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORR and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	ORR	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.90%	-0.36%	-9.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.90%	-0.12%	-9.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.39%	0.00%	-8.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.38%	-0.02%	-2.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.06%	0.03%	+4.03%

Volatility

ORR vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

Militia Long/Short Equity ETF (ORR) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that ORR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ORR	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.01%	0.09%	+4.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.37%	0.39%	+10.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.12%	0.58%	+13.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.47%	0.87%	+14.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.47%	0.87%	+14.60%

ORR vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ORR has a 14.19% expense ratio, which is higher than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

ORR vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

ORR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
ORR Militia Long/Short Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ORR and BAMU in my portfolio?

ORR and BAMU have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ORR or BAMU?

ORR has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ORR dropped -9.90% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, ORR or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, ORR leads with 24.69% vs 2.87% for BAMU. On fees, BAMU is cheaper at 1.09% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ORR or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, ORR has performed better with a 24.69% return vs 2.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ORR or BAMU?

BAMU is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 14.19% for ORR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ORR or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.00% for ORR.

What is the main difference between ORR and BAMU?

ORR is categorized as Long-Short, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Militia Investments and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 14.19% for ORR and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.