ORLG vs. MULL
ORLG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. ORLG is passively managed, while MULL is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. ORLG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.
Performance
ORLG vs. MULL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ORLG
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- -14.84%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL
- 1D
- -15.62%
- 1M
- 119.20%
- YTD
- 774.91%
- 6M
- 1,229.17%
- 1Y
- 5,016.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ORLG vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ORLG Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF | -17.32% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 545.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between ORLG and MULL is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2026 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ORLG vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank
ORLG
MULL
ORLG vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF (ORLG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ORLG | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 38.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.72 | 6.53 | -7.24 |
Drawdowns
ORLG vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ORLG drawdown since its inception was -32.62%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORLG and MULL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ORLG | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.62% | -72.29% | +39.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.31% | -15.62% | -13.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.95% | -20.61% | +2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.82% | — |
Volatility
ORLG vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ORLG | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 57.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 107.25% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.22% | 133.41% | -78.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.22% | 136.72% | -81.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.22% | 136.72% | -81.50% |
ORLG vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ORLG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ORLG vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison
ORLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% |
ORLG Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ORLG and MULL have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ORLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ORLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for ORLG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ORLG and 1.50% for MULL.
Find the right allocation for ORLG and MULL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer