PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ORLG vs. CRWU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ORLG vs. CRWU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF (ORLG) and T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ORLG

1D
8.37%
1M
-11.93%
6M
-23.86%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRWU

1D
-10.95%
1M
-63.84%
6M
-63.94%
YTD
-38.57%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ORLG vs. CRWU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ORLG and CRWU is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026

-0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ORLG vs. CRWU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF (ORLG) and T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ORLG vs. CRWU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ORLG vs. CRWU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ORLG drawdown since its inception was -39.93%, smaller than the maximum CRWU drawdown of -90.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORLG and CRWU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ORLGCRWUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.93%

-90.83%

+50.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.91%

-90.83%

+55.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.65%

-67.41%

+46.76%

Volatility

ORLG vs. CRWU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ORLGCRWUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.08%

188.74%

-129.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.08%

188.74%

-129.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.08%

188.74%

-129.66%

ORLG vs. CRWU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ORLG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CRWU's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ORLG vs. CRWU - Dividend Comparison

ORLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.85%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ORLG and CRWU have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ORLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ORLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWU.

CRWU has the higher dividend yield at 13.85%, compared with 0.00% for ORLG.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ORLG and 1.50% for CRWU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ORLG and CRWU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer