PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ORCX vs. IWMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ORCX vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ORCX achieves a 16.25% return, which is significantly higher than IWMY's 12.25% return.


ORCX

1D
-11.49%
1M
55.88%
YTD
16.25%
6M
-1.67%
1Y
15.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IWMY

1D
-1.36%
1M
3.06%
YTD
12.25%
6M
10.99%
1Y
23.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ORCX vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ORCX and IWMY is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2025

0.45

The correlation between ORCX and IWMY shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ORCX vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ORCX
ORCX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
ORCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ORCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
ORCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
ORCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
ORCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

IWMY
IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ORCX vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ORCXIWMYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.12

1.49

-1.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.25

2.02

-0.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.26

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

2.03

-1.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.28

6.66

-6.38

ORCX vs. IWMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ORCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the IWMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ORCX and IWMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ORCXIWMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

1.49

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.95

-0.97

Drawdowns

ORCX vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ORCX drawdown since its inception was -85.98%, which is greater than IWMY's maximum drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORCX and IWMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ORCXIWMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.98%

-18.72%

-67.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-85.98%

-11.57%

-74.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.17%

-1.36%

-62.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.40%

-2.98%

-41.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

57.49%

3.51%

+53.98%

Volatility

ORCX vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX) has a higher volatility of 36.85% compared to Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) at 5.42%. This indicates that ORCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ORCXIWMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

36.85%

5.42%

+31.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

82.26%

12.62%

+69.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

127.97%

15.69%

+112.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

121.00%

15.75%

+105.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

121.00%

15.75%

+105.25%

ORCX vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ORCX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than IWMY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

ORCX vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison

ORCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.96%.


PositionTTM202520242023
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
45.96%63.33%107.92%11.34%
ORCX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ORCX and IWMY have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ORCX has higher volatility (36.85%) compared to IWMY (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ORCX dropped -85.98% vs IWMY's -18.72%.

On 1-year performance, IWMY leads with 23.33% vs 15.78% for ORCX. On fees, IWMY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, IWMY has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IWMY has performed better with a 23.33% return vs 15.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWMY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for ORCX.

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 45.96%, compared with 0.00% for ORCX.

ORCX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IWMY is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for ORCX and 0.99% for IWMY.

IWMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ORCX and IWMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer