PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ORBX vs. SIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ORBX vs. SIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Space Tech ETF (ORBX) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ORBX

1D
-7.31%
1M
23.50%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SIL

1D
-4.96%
1M
0.68%
YTD
4.75%
6M
15.66%
1Y
91.23%
3Y*
49.15%
5Y*
13.96%
10Y*
10.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ORBX vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ORBX and SIL is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2026

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ORBX vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ORBX

SIL
SIL Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ORBX vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Space Tech ETF (ORBX) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ORBX vs. SIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ORBXSILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.31

0.14

+4.18

Drawdowns

ORBX vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ORBX drawdown since its inception was -18.53%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORBX and SIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ORBXSILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.53%

-82.99%

+64.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.53%

-25.87%

+7.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-51.45%

+46.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.82%

Volatility

ORBX vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ORBXSILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.41%

50.01%

+29.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.41%

39.21%

+40.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.41%

39.60%

+39.81%

ORBX vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ORBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

ORBX vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison

ORBX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ORBX
Global X Space Tech ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
1.13%1.18%2.40%0.59%0.48%1.59%1.92%1.53%1.21%0.02%3.34%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


ORBX and SIL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ORBX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ORBX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.

SIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.00% for ORBX.

ORBX is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while SIL is Silver. ORBX tracks Global X Space Tech Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ORBX and 0.65% for SIL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ORBX and SIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer