OR vs. MU

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

OR (Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. OR operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while MU operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, OR returned 9.90%/yr vs 54.18%/yr for MU. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

OR vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd (OR) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OR achieves a -16.97% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 243.32% return. Over the past 10 years, OR has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 9.90%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 54.18% annualized return.

OR

• 1D: -1.58%
• 1M: -10.39%
• 6M: -23.87%
• YTD: -16.97%
• 1Y: 5.75%
• 3Y*: 28.20%
• 5Y*: 18.38%
• 10Y*: 9.90%

MU

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: -1.65%
• 6M: 183.94%
• YTD: 243.32%
• 1Y: 687.66%
• 3Y*: 149.71%
• 5Y*: 66.39%
• 10Y*: 54.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OR vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OR Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd	-16.97%	96.95%	28.14%	19.96%	0.02%	-2.01%	32.58%	12.20%	-22.72%	20.74%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	243.32%	240.24%	-0.96%	71.93%	-45.93%	24.21%	39.79%	69.49%	-22.84%	87.59%

Correlation

The correlation between OR and MU is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap OR : $5.49B MU : $1.11T
EPS OR : $1.34 MU : $44.42
PE Ratio OR : 21.81 MU : 22.05
PEG Ratio OR : 0.12 MU : 0.08
PS Ratio OR : 17.03 MU : 12.33
PB Ratio OR : 3.74 MU : 11.10
Total Revenue (TTM) OR : $325.18M MU : $90.27B
Gross Profit (TTM) OR : $275.03M MU : $65.51B
EBITDA (TTM) OR : $330.83M MU : $44.96B

Return for Risk

OR vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OR

OR Risk / Return Rank: 52
OR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
OR Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
OR Omega Ratio Rank: 50
OR Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
OR Martin Ratio Rank: 53

MU

MU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OR vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd (OR) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OR	MU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.22	9.29	-9.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.58	5.41	-4.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.69	-0.61
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.26	23.23	-22.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.60	83.25	-82.66

OR vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OR Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 9.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OR and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OR vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OR drawdown since its inception was -61.90%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OR and MU.

Drawdown Indicators

	OR	MU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.90%	-98.25%	+36.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.54%	-30.28%	-8.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.54%	-57.63%	+19.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.54%	-57.63%	+19.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.90%	-57.63%	-4.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.43%	-19.29%	-19.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.16%	-58.07%	+39.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.70%	8.43%	+8.27%

Volatility

OR vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd (OR) is 13.74%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 33.63%. This indicates that OR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OR	MU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.74%	33.63%	-19.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.47%	62.19%	-23.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.74%	75.68%	-29.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.04%	54.75%	-18.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.60%	50.65%	-12.05%

Dividends

OR vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

OR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than MU's 0.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	0.05%	0.16%	0.55%	0.54%	0.89%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OR Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd	0.79%	0.59%	1.02%	1.34%	1.38%	1.37%	1.18%	1.56%	1.72%	1.56%	1.65%

Financials

OR vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

OR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd reported a gross profit of 87.28M and revenue of 101.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.1%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.

OR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd reported an operating income of 79.13M and revenue of 101.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 78.0%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.

OR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd reported a net income of 72.56M and revenue of 101.41M, resulting in a net margin of 71.6%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OR and MU in my portfolio?

OR and MU have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OR or MU?

MU has higher volatility (33.63%) compared to OR (13.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OR dropped -61.90% vs MU's -98.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.29 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.