OPTZ vs. LSAF

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

OPTZ (Optimize Strategy Index ETF) and LSAF (LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - OPTZ tracks the Optimize Strategy Index while LSAF tracks the AlphaFactor US Core Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, OPTZ returned 43.75% vs 30.03% for LSAF. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. OPTZ charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LSAF.

Performance

OPTZ vs. LSAF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) and LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OPTZ achieves a 24.46% return, which is significantly higher than LSAF's 19.96% return.

OPTZ

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -3.89%
• 6M: 20.35%
• YTD: 24.46%
• 1Y: 43.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 28.91%

LSAF

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 2.49%
• 6M: 17.23%
• YTD: 19.96%
• 1Y: 30.03%
• 3Y*: 18.58%
• 5Y*: 10.90%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LSAF LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF	$265.84K	$205.64K	$201.86K
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF	$154.33K	$341.82K	$247.38K

OPTZ vs. LSAF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF	24.46%	22.83%	16.41%
LSAF LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF	19.96%	12.01%	10.75%

Correlation

The correlation between OPTZ and LSAF is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024	0.75

The correlation between OPTZ and LSAF shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OPTZ vs. LSAF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OPTZ	LSAF
Technology	56.6%	15.4%
Healthcare	9.7%	7.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	19.9%
Industrials	7.9%	10.7%
Financial Services	7.8%	16.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	4.1%
Communication Services	2.4%	4.7%
Real Estate	1.3%	2.1%
Energy	1.2%	3.3%
Basic Materials	1.0%	5.8%
Utilities	0.6%	0.9%

Return for Risk

OPTZ vs. LSAF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OPTZ

OPTZ Risk / Return Rank: 81
OPTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
OPTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
OPTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 77
OPTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
OPTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 85

LSAF

LSAF Risk / Return Rank: 88
LSAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
LSAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
LSAF Omega Ratio Rank: 82
LSAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
LSAF Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OPTZ vs. LSAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) and LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OPTZ	LSAF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	2.03	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	2.98	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.35	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	4.41	-1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.07	14.86	-2.79

OPTZ vs. LSAF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OPTZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the LSAF Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OPTZ and LSAF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OPTZ vs. LSAF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OPTZ drawdown since its inception was -25.75%, smaller than the maximum LSAF drawdown of -41.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPTZ and LSAF.

Drawdown Indicators

	OPTZ	LSAF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.75%	-41.67%	+15.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.39%	-6.58%	-6.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.26%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.85%	-1.48%	-8.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.51%	-6.21%	+2.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.42%	1.95%	+1.47%

Volatility

OPTZ vs. LSAF - Volatility Comparison

Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) has a higher volatility of 8.76% compared to LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF) at 4.21%. This indicates that OPTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OPTZ	LSAF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.76%	4.21%	+4.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.77%	10.49%	+8.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.97%	14.36%	+7.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.88%	18.38%	+3.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.88%	21.73%	+0.15%

OPTZ vs. LSAF - Expense Ratio Comparison

OPTZ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LSAF's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

OPTZ vs. LSAF - Dividend Comparison

OPTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than LSAF's 0.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LSAF LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF	0.57%	0.69%	0.42%	0.84%	0.96%	0.37%	0.53%	0.71%	0.20%
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF	0.47%	0.58%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OPTZ and LSAF in my portfolio?

OPTZ and LSAF have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OPTZ or LSAF?

OPTZ has higher volatility (8.76%) compared to LSAF (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OPTZ dropped -25.75% vs LSAF's -41.67%.

Which ETF is better, OPTZ or LSAF?

On 1-year performance, OPTZ leads with 43.75% vs 30.03% for LSAF. On fees, OPTZ is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, LSAF has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OPTZ or LSAF?

Over the 1-year period, OPTZ has performed better with a 43.75% return vs 30.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OPTZ or LSAF?

OPTZ is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LSAF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OPTZ or LSAF?

LSAF has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.47% for OPTZ.

What is the main difference between OPTZ and LSAF?

OPTZ tracks Optimize Strategy Index, while LSAF tracks AlphaFactor US Core Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Optimize and Redwood. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for OPTZ and 0.75% for LSAF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LSAF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.