PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OPRA vs. NEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OPRA vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opera Limited (OPRA) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OPRA achieves a 39.94% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's -5.74% return.


OPRA

1D
1.23%
1M
-3.86%
6M
55.20%
YTD
39.94%
1Y
19.59%
3Y*
7.11%
5Y*
21.03%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.23%

NEM

1D
-2.14%
1M
0.44%
6M
-16.23%
YTD
-5.74%
1Y
52.51%
3Y*
33.89%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
10.07%
ALL TIME*
4.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$671.95M$683.19M$803.32M
$6.13M$6.32M$6.70M

OPRA vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
OPRA
Opera Limited
39.94%-22.08%52.02%140.60%-10.91%-22.67%-1.30%66.37%-61.23%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
-5.74%172.82%-7.83%-8.76%-20.77%7.40%40.28%30.52%-7.54%

Correlation

The correlation between OPRA and NEM is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OPRA:

$1.69B

NEM:

$98.74B

EPS

OPRA:

$1.26

NEM:

$7.88

PE Ratio

OPRA:

14.99

NEM:

11.89

PEG Ratio

OPRA:

0.06

NEM:

0.31

PS Ratio

OPRA:

2.66

NEM:

5.34

PB Ratio

OPRA:

1.74

NEM:

2.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

OPRA:

$647.66M

NEM:

$19.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OPRA:

$378.92M

NEM:

$10.94B

EBITDA (TTM)

OPRA:

$154.47M

NEM:

$14.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OPRA vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OPRA
OPRA Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
OPRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPRA Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
OPRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPRA Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OPRA vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opera Limited (OPRA) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OPRANEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.21

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

1.64

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.87

3.61

-2.75

OPRA vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OPRA Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OPRA and NEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OPRA vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OPRA drawdown since its inception was -72.85%, smaller than the maximum NEM drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPRA and NEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OPRANEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.85%

-81.30%

+8.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.28%

-32.10%

-9.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.39%

-36.57%

-6.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.86%

-62.40%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.19%

-28.67%

+7.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.75%

-41.33%

+0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.64%

14.57%

+8.07%

Volatility

OPRA vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

Opera Limited (OPRA) and Newmont Corporation (NEM) have volatilities of 12.05% and 11.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OPRANEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.05%

11.58%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.42%

37.40%

+2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.38%

47.45%

+4.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.59%

38.35%

+22.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.99%

35.74%

+28.25%

Dividends

OPRA vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

OPRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than NEM's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.09%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%
OPRA
Opera Limited
4.23%5.65%4.22%8.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

OPRA vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Opera Limited and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


OPRA and NEM have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OPRA has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to NEM (11.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OPRA dropped -72.85% vs NEM's -81.30%.

NEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OPRA and NEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer