OPPG vs. GDMN
OPPG (WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - OPPG is a Global Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Index, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. OPPG is passively managed, while GDMN is actively managed. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. OPPG charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.
Performance
OPPG vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
OPPG
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GDMN
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- 6M
- -34.79%
- YTD
- -19.05%
- 1Y
- 45.97%
- 3Y*
- 56.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 31.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.44M | $2.18M | $3.36M | |
| $169.47K | $79.83K | $79.83K |
OPPG vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
OPPG WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund | 2.90% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | -1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between OPPG and GDMN is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2026 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OPPG vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank
OPPG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDMN
OPPG vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund (OPPG) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OPPG | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.84 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OPPG vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OPPG drawdown since its inception was -3.61%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPPG and GDMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OPPG | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.61% | -52.82% | +49.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -52.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -46.86% | +46.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.19% | -19.88% | +18.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 25.12% | — |
Volatility
OPPG vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OPPG | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 49.25% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.94% | 64.97% | -50.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 48.33% | -33.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 48.33% | -33.39% |
OPPG vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison
OPPG has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
OPPG vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison
OPPG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | 3.34% | 2.70% | 9.44% | 7.69% | 1.44% |
OPPG WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OPPG and GDMN have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDMN is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDMN is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for OPPG.
GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 0.00% for OPPG.
OPPG is categorized as Global Equities, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for OPPG and 0.45% for GDMN.
Find the right allocation for OPPG and GDMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer