PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OPPAX vs. PGVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OPPAX vs. PGVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Fund (OPPAX) and Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OPPAX achieves a 5.85% return, which is significantly lower than PGVFX's 18.86% return. Over the past 10 years, OPPAX has outperformed PGVFX with an annualized return of 12.67%, while PGVFX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.58% annualized return.


OPPAX

1D
-3.50%
1M
0.75%
YTD
5.85%
6M
4.94%
1Y
15.71%
3Y*
16.26%
5Y*
5.86%
10Y*
12.67%

PGVFX

1D
-1.95%
1M
0.48%
YTD
18.86%
6M
18.76%
1Y
35.91%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
9.99%
10Y*
11.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OPPAX vs. PGVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OPPAX
Invesco Global Fund
5.85%15.20%16.16%34.18%-32.18%15.23%27.64%31.58%-13.65%36.25%
PGVFX
Polaris Global Value Fund
18.86%27.01%5.33%14.76%-12.00%15.38%6.65%22.83%-12.64%20.60%

Correlation

The correlation between OPPAX and PGVFX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 1998

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between OPPAX and PGVFX has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OPPAX vs. PGVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OPPAX
OPPAX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
OPPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
OPPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

PGVFX
PGVFX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PGVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PGVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OPPAX vs. PGVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Fund (OPPAX) and Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OPPAXPGVFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.57

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

4.35

-3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.48

15.62

-11.14

OPPAX vs. PGVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OPPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the PGVFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OPPAX and PGVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OPPAX vs. PGVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OPPAX drawdown since its inception was -60.39%, smaller than the maximum PGVFX drawdown of -68.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPPAX and PGVFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OPPAXPGVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.39%

-68.09%

+7.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.26%

-8.76%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.69%

-12.53%

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.90%

-27.58%

-14.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.90%

-41.26%

-0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.40%

-1.95%

-2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.44%

-11.28%

-4.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.24%

2.43%

+1.81%

Volatility

OPPAX vs. PGVFX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global Fund (OPPAX) has a higher volatility of 9.08% compared to Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) at 4.64%. This indicates that OPPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OPPAXPGVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.08%

4.64%

+4.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.73%

10.38%

+5.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.78%

12.42%

+6.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.60%

13.89%

+7.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.72%

15.72%

+5.00%

OPPAX vs. PGVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OPPAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than PGVFX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

OPPAX vs. PGVFX - Dividend Comparison

OPPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.42%, more than PGVFX's 4.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OPPAX
Invesco Global Fund
23.42%24.79%11.93%10.72%14.18%7.18%5.72%1.35%12.92%5.92%0.69%5.17%
PGVFX
Polaris Global Value Fund
4.35%5.17%5.65%1.68%3.55%4.05%1.55%3.69%3.39%1.50%1.32%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


OPPAX and PGVFX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OPPAX has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to PGVFX (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OPPAX dropped -60.39% vs PGVFX's -68.09%.

PGVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OPPAX and PGVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer