PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OPIGX vs. QDIBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OPIGX vs. QDIBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Core Bond Fund (OPIGX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OPIGX achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly lower than QDIBX's -0.11% return.


OPIGX

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
-0.39%
6M
-0.40%
1Y
3.74%
3Y*
3.35%
5Y*
-0.77%
10Y*
1.44%

QDIBX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
-0.09%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
0.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OPIGX vs. QDIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
OPIGX
Invesco Core Bond Fund
-0.39%5.83%1.81%4.55%-14.37%-1.58%9.23%-0.13%
QDIBX
Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans
-0.11%7.72%1.66%6.71%-14.11%-0.17%6.77%-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between OPIGX and QDIBX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2019

0.87

The correlation between OPIGX and QDIBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OPIGX vs. QDIBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OPIGX
OPIGX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
OPIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
OPIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

QDIBX
QDIBX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
QDIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
QDIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OPIGX vs. QDIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Core Bond Fund (OPIGX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OPIGXQDIBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

1.20

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

1.79

-0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.21

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

1.57

-0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.25

4.84

-1.58

OPIGX vs. QDIBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OPIGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the QDIBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OPIGX and QDIBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OPIGXQDIBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

1.20

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

0.02

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.16

+0.39

Drawdowns

OPIGX vs. QDIBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OPIGX drawdown since its inception was -46.78%, which is greater than QDIBX's maximum drawdown of -19.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPIGX and QDIBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OPIGXQDIBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.78%

-19.63%

-27.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.80%

-2.97%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.55%

-5.37%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.93%

-19.63%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.43%

-1.87%

-3.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-6.39%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

0.97%

+0.12%

Volatility

OPIGX vs. QDIBX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Core Bond Fund (OPIGX) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) at 1.33%. This indicates that OPIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OPIGXQDIBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

1.33%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.03%

2.62%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.25%

3.83%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.02%

6.59%

-0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.97%

6.27%

-1.30%

OPIGX vs. QDIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OPIGX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than QDIBX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

OPIGX vs. QDIBX - Dividend Comparison

OPIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than QDIBX's 3.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OPIGX
Invesco Core Bond Fund
2.79%3.51%4.13%3.53%2.61%1.75%8.30%3.12%3.22%2.73%2.46%3.21%
QDIBX
Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans
3.50%3.50%3.55%3.65%2.51%1.80%3.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OPIGX and QDIBX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OPIGX has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to QDIBX (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OPIGX dropped -46.78% vs QDIBX's -19.63%.

QDIBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OPIGX and QDIBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer