PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OPEN.DE vs. CBUG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OPEN.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Refinitiv Inclusion and Diversity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (OPEN.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OPEN.DE achieves a 19.86% return, which is significantly higher than CBUG.DE's 14.43% return.


OPEN.DE

1D
-0.71%
1M
10.85%
YTD
19.86%
6M
21.67%
1Y
28.74%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
11.65%
10Y*

CBUG.DE

1D
0.52%
1M
4.17%
YTD
14.43%
6M
15.69%
1Y
28.51%
3Y*
13.75%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OPEN.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
OPEN.DE
iShares Refinitiv Inclusion and Diversity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
19.86%10.46%14.15%11.37%-3.82%3.10%
CBUG.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist)
14.43%6.47%13.17%11.34%-14.17%2.96%

Correlation

The correlation between OPEN.DE and CBUG.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021

0.84

The correlation between OPEN.DE and CBUG.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OPEN.DE vs. CBUG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OPEN.DE
OPEN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
OPEN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPEN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPEN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
OPEN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPEN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUG.DE
CBUG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CBUG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OPEN.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Refinitiv Inclusion and Diversity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (OPEN.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OPEN.DECBUG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.37

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

3.94

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.97

14.66

-1.69

OPEN.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OPEN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the CBUG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OPEN.DE and CBUG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OPEN.DECBUG.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.04

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.42

+0.34

Drawdowns

OPEN.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OPEN.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.09%, which is greater than CBUG.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPEN.DE and CBUG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OPEN.DECBUG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.09%

-24.59%

-8.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-7.21%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.68%

-24.59%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.06%

0.00%

-2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.97%

-7.48%

+3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

1.94%

+0.27%

Volatility

OPEN.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Refinitiv Inclusion and Diversity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (OPEN.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE) at 3.41%. This indicates that OPEN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OPEN.DECBUG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

3.41%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.68%

9.78%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

13.90%

-1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.04%

16.71%

-3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.46%

16.71%

-1.25%

OPEN.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

OPEN.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUG.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

OPEN.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither OPEN.DE nor CBUG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


OPEN.DE and CBUG.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUG.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUG.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for OPEN.DE.

OPEN.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while CBUG.DE tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for OPEN.DE and 0.10% for CBUG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OPEN.DE and CBUG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer