OPATX vs. NMTRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Pennsylvania Municipal Fund (OPATX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX).
OPATX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Sep 17, 1989. NMTRX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on May 30, 2007.
Performance
OPATX vs. NMTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OPATX vs. NMTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OPATX Invesco Pennsylvania Municipal Fund | -1.79% | 2.66% | 3.25% | 5.69% | -10.34% | 4.40% | 5.23% | 11.84% | 11.32% | 0.14% |
NMTRX Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts | -0.32% | 3.90% | 1.99% | 6.21% | -11.98% | 2.69% | 5.25% | 9.26% | 1.06% | 7.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OPATX achieves a -1.79% return, which is significantly lower than NMTRX's -0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, OPATX has outperformed NMTRX with an annualized return of 3.32%, while NMTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.25% annualized return.
OPATX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- YTD
- -1.79%
- 6M
- -0.93%
- 1Y
- 0.45%
- 3Y*
- 2.46%
- 5Y*
- 0.43%
- 10Y*
- 3.32%
NMTRX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- 3.15%
- 5Y*
- 0.36%
- 10Y*
- 2.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OPATX vs. NMTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OPATX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than NMTRX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OPATX vs. NMTRX — Risk / Return Rank
OPATX
NMTRX
OPATX vs. NMTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Pennsylvania Municipal Fund (OPATX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OPATX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.19 | 0.91 | -0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.31 | 1.26 | -0.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.25 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 1.03 | -1.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.02 | 3.03 | -3.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OPATX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | 0.91 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.51 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.97 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between OPATX and NMTRX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
OPATX vs. NMTRX - Dividend Comparison
OPATX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than NMTRX's 4.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OPATX Invesco Pennsylvania Municipal Fund | 2.84% | 4.85% | 4.27% | 3.04% | 2.69% | 3.08% | 3.25% | 3.47% | 3.59% | 5.21% | 5.68% | 5.83% |
NMTRX Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts | 4.20% | 4.46% | 3.55% | 3.67% | 3.28% | 2.73% | 2.92% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 3.28% | 3.71% | 3.91% |
Drawdowns
OPATX vs. NMTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OPATX drawdown since its inception was -38.22%, which is greater than NMTRX's maximum drawdown of -16.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPATX and NMTRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OPATX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.22% | -16.36% | -21.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.94% | -4.75% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.53% | -16.36% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.53% | -16.36% | +0.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.94% | -2.45% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.92% | -2.93% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 1.61% | +0.77% |
Volatility
OPATX vs. NMTRX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Pennsylvania Municipal Fund (OPATX) has a higher volatility of 1.49% compared to Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) at 1.04%. This indicates that OPATX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OPATX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.49% | 1.04% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.62% | 1.82% | +0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.80% | 4.94% | +2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.08% | 3.97% | +1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.76% | 4.38% | +0.38% |