OP7E.DE vs. LCUS.DE
OP7E.DE (Ossiam Bloomberg USA PAB UCITS ETF (EUR)) and LCUS.DE (Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - OP7E.DE tracks the Bloomberg PAB US Large & Mid Cap while LCUS.DE tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OP7E.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for LCUS.DE.
Performance
OP7E.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
OP7E.DE
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 6.76%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 9.62%
- 1Y
- 18.97%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCUS.DE
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OP7E.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OP7E.DE Ossiam Bloomberg USA PAB UCITS ETF (EUR) | 9.44% | 1.18% | 29.02% | 22.72% | -14.67% |
LCUS.DE Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 3.40% | 32.87% | 22.96% | -14.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between OP7E.DE and LCUS.DE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2022 | 0.74 |
The correlation between OP7E.DE and LCUS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OP7E.DE vs. LCUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
OP7E.DE
LCUS.DE
OP7E.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Bloomberg USA PAB UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP7E.DE) and Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OP7E.DE | LCUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.82 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OP7E.DE | LCUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | — | — |
Drawdowns
OP7E.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OP7E.DE | LCUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | — | — |
Volatility
OP7E.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OP7E.DE | LCUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.11% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.78% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.78% | — | — |
OP7E.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
OP7E.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUS.DE's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
OP7E.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither OP7E.DE nor LCUS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCUS.DE Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.84% | 0.78% | 2.27% | 1.12% | 1.52% | 1.10% | 1.30% |
OP7E.DE Ossiam Bloomberg USA PAB UCITS ETF (EUR) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OP7E.DE and LCUS.DE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCUS.DE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCUS.DE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for OP7E.DE.
OP7E.DE tracks Bloomberg PAB US Large & Mid Cap, while LCUS.DE tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for OP7E.DE and 0.04% for LCUS.DE.
Find the right allocation for OP7E.DE and LCUS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer