PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OP7E.DE vs. 2B7K.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OP7E.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Ossiam Bloomberg USA PAB UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP7E.DE) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OP7E.DE achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly lower than 2B7K.DE's 10.83% return.


OP7E.DE

1D
-0.19%
1M
6.76%
YTD
9.44%
6M
9.62%
1Y
18.97%
3Y*
16.14%
5Y*
10Y*

2B7K.DE

1D
0.18%
1M
5.71%
YTD
10.83%
6M
11.69%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
12.93%
5Y*
10.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OP7E.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OP7E.DE
Ossiam Bloomberg USA PAB UCITS ETF (EUR)
9.44%1.18%29.02%22.72%-14.67%
2B7K.DE
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
10.83%2.85%17.54%20.90%-11.68%

Correlation

The correlation between OP7E.DE and 2B7K.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2022

0.92

The correlation between OP7E.DE and 2B7K.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OP7E.DE vs. 2B7K.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OP7E.DE
OP7E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
OP7E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OP7E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
OP7E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
OP7E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
OP7E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

2B7K.DE
2B7K.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
2B7K.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OP7E.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Bloomberg USA PAB UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP7E.DE) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OP7E.DE2B7K.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

2.37

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.82

8.64

-1.81

OP7E.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OP7E.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the 2B7K.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OP7E.DE and 2B7K.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OP7E.DE2B7K.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

1.48

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.79

-0.04

Drawdowns

OP7E.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OP7E.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.71%, smaller than the maximum 2B7K.DE drawdown of -31.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OP7E.DE and 2B7K.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OP7E.DE2B7K.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.71%

-31.65%

+7.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-7.81%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.71%

-21.29%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

0.00%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-5.16%

+0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

2.15%

+0.62%

Volatility

OP7E.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ossiam Bloomberg USA PAB UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP7E.DE) is 3.07%, while iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE) has a volatility of 3.69%. This indicates that OP7E.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2B7K.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OP7E.DE2B7K.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

3.69%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.23%

9.21%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

12.48%

-0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.78%

14.60%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.78%

16.18%

-1.40%

OP7E.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

OP7E.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than 2B7K.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

OP7E.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither OP7E.DE nor 2B7K.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


OP7E.DE and 2B7K.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, OP7E.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OP7E.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for 2B7K.DE.

OP7E.DE tracks Bloomberg PAB US Large & Mid Cap, while 2B7K.DE tracks MSCI World SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for OP7E.DE and 0.20% for 2B7K.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OP7E.DE and 2B7K.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer