OP6E.DE vs. AMEA.DE
OP6E.DE (Ossiam Bloomberg Asia Pacific ex Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR)) and AMEA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - OP6E.DE tracks the Bloomberg PAB APAC DM ex-Japan Large & Mid Cap while AMEA.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OP6E.DE returned 8.96%/yr vs 22.86%/yr for AMEA.DE. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OP6E.DE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AMEA.DE.
Performance
OP6E.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OP6E.DE achieves a 4.48% return, which is significantly lower than AMEA.DE's 31.99% return.
OP6E.DE
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -3.04%
- YTD
- 4.48%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- 1Y
- 7.51%
- 3Y*
- 8.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMEA.DE
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 31.99%
- 6M
- 32.57%
- 1Y
- 54.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
OP6E.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OP6E.DE Ossiam Bloomberg Asia Pacific ex Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR) | 4.48% | 6.39% | 15.17% | 0.41% | -5.27% |
AMEA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR | 31.99% | 18.01% | 18.95% | 3.12% | -8.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between OP6E.DE and AMEA.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2022 | 0.65 |
The correlation between OP6E.DE and AMEA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OP6E.DE vs. AMEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
OP6E.DE
AMEA.DE
OP6E.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Bloomberg Asia Pacific ex Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP6E.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OP6E.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.50 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 4.74 | -3.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.95 | 17.16 | -14.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OP6E.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 2.85 | -2.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.56 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
OP6E.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OP6E.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.34%, smaller than the maximum AMEA.DE drawdown of -34.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OP6E.DE and AMEA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OP6E.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.34% | -34.43% | +16.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.72% | -11.58% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.34% | -20.48% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.43% | -2.69% | -1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.86% | -11.52% | +6.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 3.21% | -0.64% |
Volatility
OP6E.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ossiam Bloomberg Asia Pacific ex Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP6E.DE) is 2.87%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) has a volatility of 8.10%. This indicates that OP6E.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMEA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OP6E.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 8.10% | -5.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.56% | 16.15% | -7.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.49% | 19.29% | -7.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 18.27% | -3.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 18.97% | -4.22% |
OP6E.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
OP6E.DE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AMEA.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
OP6E.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither OP6E.DE nor AMEA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
OP6E.DE and AMEA.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMEA.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMEA.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for OP6E.DE.
OP6E.DE tracks Bloomberg PAB APAC DM ex-Japan Large & Mid Cap, while AMEA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for OP6E.DE and 0.20% for AMEA.DE.
Find the right allocation for OP6E.DE and AMEA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer