PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OOSP vs. BLUI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OOSP vs. BLUI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) and Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OOSP achieves a 3.25% return, which is significantly lower than BLUI's 4.27% return.


OOSP

1D
0.05%
1M
0.26%
6M
2.19%
YTD
3.25%
1Y
5.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.39%

BLUI

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.25%
6M
2.95%
YTD
4.27%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$274.13K$213.50K$247.19K
$61.71K$74.09K$68.76K

OOSP vs. BLUI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OOSP and BLUI is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OOSP vs. BLUI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OOSP
OOSP Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
OOSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OOSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
OOSP Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
OOSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
OOSP Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BLUI
BLUI Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BLUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLUI Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BLUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLUI Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OOSP vs. BLUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) and Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OOSPBLUIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.38

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.74

3.01

+1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.26

13.18

+4.07

OOSP vs. BLUI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OOSP Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the BLUI Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OOSP and BLUI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OOSP vs. BLUI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OOSP drawdown since its inception was -1.31%, smaller than the maximum BLUI drawdown of -2.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OOSP and BLUI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OOSPBLUIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.31%

-2.43%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.31%

-2.43%

+1.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.21%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.20%

-0.34%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.55%

-0.19%

Volatility

OOSP vs. BLUI - Volatility Comparison

Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI) at 0.97%. This indicates that OOSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLUI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OOSPBLUIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

0.97%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.36%

3.15%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79%

3.81%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.36%

3.84%

-0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.36%

3.84%

-0.48%

OOSP vs. BLUI - Expense Ratio Comparison

OOSP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than BLUI's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

OOSP vs. BLUI - Dividend Comparison

OOSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.40%, more than BLUI's 5.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BLUI
Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF
5.12%2.91%0.00%
OOSP
Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF
6.40%6.71%5.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


OOSP and BLUI have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OOSP has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to BLUI (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OOSP dropped -1.31% vs BLUI's -2.43%.

On 1-year performance, BLUI leads with 7.13% vs 5.94% for OOSP. On fees, BLUI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BLUI has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BLUI has performed better with a 7.13% return vs 5.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BLUI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for OOSP.

OOSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.40%, compared with 5.12% for BLUI.

They also come from different issuers: Obra and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for OOSP and 0.75% for BLUI.

BLUI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OOSP and BLUI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer