ONOF vs. MOOD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ONOF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF) and MOOD (Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. ONOF is passively managed, while MOOD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ONOF returned 12.23%/yr vs 19.98%/yr for MOOD. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ONOF charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for MOOD.

Performance

ONOF vs. MOOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONOF achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly lower than MOOD's 12.70% return.

ONOF

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: -1.14%
• YTD: 4.74%
• 6M: 3.77%
• 1Y: 19.41%
• 3Y*: 12.23%
• 5Y*: 8.47%
• 10Y*: —

MOOD

• 1D: -1.87%
• 1M: -0.20%
• YTD: 12.70%
• 6M: 11.32%
• 1Y: 33.13%
• 3Y*: 19.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONOF vs. MOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ONOF Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF	4.74%	8.90%	19.45%	11.57%	6.90%
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	12.70%	30.39%	12.53%	12.56%	-3.31%

Correlation

The correlation between ONOF and MOOD is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022	0.70

The correlation between ONOF and MOOD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ONOF vs. MOOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONOF

ONOF Risk / Return Rank: 53
ONOF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
ONOF Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ONOF Omega Ratio Rank: 49
ONOF Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ONOF Martin Ratio Rank: 57

MOOD

MOOD Risk / Return Rank: 69
MOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
MOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
MOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 78
MOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONOF vs. MOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ONOF	MOOD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	2.27	-0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	2.70	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.44	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	3.43	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.41	10.57	-1.16

ONOF vs. MOOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONOF Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the MOOD Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONOF and MOOD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ONOF vs. MOOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONOF drawdown since its inception was -26.21%, which is greater than MOOD's maximum drawdown of -14.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONOF and MOOD.

Drawdown Indicators

	ONOF	MOOD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.21%	-14.34%	-11.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.86%	-9.71%	+2.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.67%	-9.71%	-11.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.07%	-2.57%	-0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.11%	-2.31%	-3.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	3.14%	-1.07%

Volatility

ONOF vs. MOOD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) have volatilities of 4.75% and 4.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ONOF	MOOD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.75%	4.67%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.90%	12.97%	-4.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.87%	14.69%	-2.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.42%	12.18%	+2.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.39%	12.18%	+2.21%

ONOF vs. MOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONOF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than MOOD's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

ONOF vs. MOOD - Dividend Comparison

ONOF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than MOOD's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	0.36%	0.40%	1.33%	1.34%	1.43%	0.00%
ONOF Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF	1.32%	1.38%	0.93%	1.37%	1.92%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ONOF and MOOD in my portfolio?

ONOF and MOOD have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ONOF or MOOD?

ONOF has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to MOOD (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONOF dropped -26.21% vs MOOD's -14.34%.

Which ETF is better, ONOF or MOOD?

On 3-year performance, MOOD leads with 19.98% vs 12.23% for ONOF. On fees, ONOF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ONOF or MOOD?

Over the 3-year period, MOOD has performed better with a 19.98% return vs 12.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ONOF or MOOD?

ONOF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for MOOD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ONOF or MOOD?

ONOF has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.36% for MOOD.

What is the main difference between ONOF and MOOD?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Relative Sentiment. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ONOF and 0.73% for MOOD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MOOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.