ONOF vs. LEXI
ONOF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF) and LEXI (Alexis Practical Tactical ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. ONOF is passively managed, while LEXI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ONOF returned 13.72%/yr vs 20.28%/yr for LEXI. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ONOF charges 0.39%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for LEXI.
Performance
ONOF vs. LEXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONOF achieves a 7.32% return, which is significantly lower than LEXI's 13.13% return.
ONOF
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 5.26%
- YTD
- 7.32%
- 6M
- 7.29%
- 1Y
- 23.60%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.34%
- 10Y*
- —
LEXI
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 13.13%
- 6M
- 13.75%
- 1Y
- 29.19%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ONOF vs. LEXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONOF Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF | 7.32% | 8.90% | 19.45% | 11.57% | -11.89% | 10.87% |
LEXI Alexis Practical Tactical ETF | 13.13% | 19.23% | 16.51% | 16.58% | -14.36% | 8.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONOF and LEXI is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021 | 0.81 |
The correlation between ONOF and LEXI shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ONOF vs. LEXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ONOF
LEXI
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
ONOF
LEXI
Communication Services
ONOF
LEXI
Financial Services
ONOF
LEXI
Consumer Cyclical
ONOF
LEXI
Healthcare
ONOF
LEXI
Industrials
ONOF
LEXI
Consumer Defensive
ONOF
LEXI
Energy
ONOF
LEXI
Utilities
ONOF
LEXI
Basic Materials
ONOF
LEXI
Real Estate
ONOF
LEXI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONOF vs. LEXI — Risk / Return Rank
ONOF
LEXI
ONOF vs. LEXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF) and Alexis Practical Tactical ETF (LEXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ONOF | LEXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.51 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.45 | 3.61 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.88 | 17.41 | -5.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ONOF | LEXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 2.76 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.78 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
ONOF vs. LEXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONOF drawdown since its inception was -26.21%, which is greater than LEXI's maximum drawdown of -22.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONOF and LEXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONOF | LEXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.21% | -22.01% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.86% | -8.12% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.67% | -15.94% | -5.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -0.17% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.15% | -5.19% | -0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 1.68% | +0.31% |
Volatility
ONOF vs. LEXI - Volatility Comparison
Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF) and Alexis Practical Tactical ETF (LEXI) have volatilities of 3.03% and 3.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONOF | LEXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.03% | 3.07% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.95% | 8.79% | -0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.25% | 10.64% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 14.64% | -0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.33% | 14.64% | -0.31% |
ONOF vs. LEXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONOF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than LEXI's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
ONOF vs. LEXI - Dividend Comparison
ONOF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than LEXI's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEXI Alexis Practical Tactical ETF | 0.83% | 0.94% | 2.17% | 1.34% | 0.95% | 0.23% |
ONOF Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF | 1.29% | 1.38% | 0.93% | 1.37% | 1.92% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, ONOF and LEXI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LEXI has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to ONOF (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONOF dropped -26.21% vs LEXI's -22.01%.
On 3-year performance, LEXI leads with 20.28% vs 13.72% for ONOF. On fees, ONOF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, LEXI has performed better with a 20.28% return vs 13.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONOF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for LEXI.
ONOF has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.83% for LEXI.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Alexis. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ONOF and 1.00% for LEXI.
LEXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ONOF and LEXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer