ONLN vs. AWAY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ONLN (ProShares Online Retail ETF) and AWAY (ETFMG Travel Tech ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - ONLN tracks the ProShares Online Retail Index while AWAY tracks the Prime Travel Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ONLN returned -7.66%/yr vs -10.70%/yr for AWAY. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ONLN charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AWAY.

Performance

ONLN vs. AWAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) and ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONLN achieves a -8.58% return, which is significantly higher than AWAY's -15.46% return.

ONLN

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: -5.60%
• YTD: -8.58%
• 6M: -9.03%
• 1Y: 10.27%
• 3Y*: 19.82%
• 5Y*: -7.66%
• 10Y*: —

AWAY

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: 6.45%
• YTD: -15.46%
• 6M: -15.99%
• 1Y: -14.67%
• 3Y*: 1.28%
• 5Y*: -10.70%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONLN vs. AWAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF	-8.58%	33.03%	24.85%	27.37%	-50.07%	-25.22%	92.07%
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF	-15.46%	-3.36%	10.44%	17.94%	-32.25%	-5.91%	3.47%

Correlation

The correlation between ONLN and AWAY is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2020	0.66

The correlation between ONLN and AWAY shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ONLN vs. AWAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ONLN	AWAY
Consumer Cyclical	95.1%	64.2%
Technology	3.3%	29.0%
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	4.4%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	1.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ONLN vs. AWAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONLN

ONLN Risk / Return Rank: 15
ONLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
ONLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
ONLN Omega Ratio Rank: 14
ONLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
ONLN Martin Ratio Rank: 15

AWAY

AWAY Risk / Return Rank: 4
AWAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
AWAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
AWAY Omega Ratio Rank: 4
AWAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
AWAY Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONLN vs. AWAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) and ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ONLN	AWAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	-0.66	+1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.74	-0.81	+1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	0.91	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.52	-0.45	+0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.23	-0.85	+2.09

ONLN vs. AWAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONLN Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is higher than the AWAY Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONLN and AWAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ONLN vs. AWAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONLN drawdown since its inception was -71.77%, which is greater than AWAY's maximum drawdown of -56.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONLN and AWAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	ONLN	AWAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.77%	-56.57%	-15.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.75%	-32.83%	+13.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.97%	-32.83%	+4.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-69.19%	-51.49%	-17.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.80%	-49.00%	+8.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.45%	-36.32%	+0.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.35%	17.21%	-8.86%

Volatility

ONLN vs. AWAY - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) at 7.03%. This indicates that ONLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ONLN	AWAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.48%	7.03%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.30%	18.51%	-0.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.36%	22.44%	+1.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.15%	26.89%	+6.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.08%	31.74%	+0.34%

ONLN vs. AWAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONLN has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than AWAY's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ONLN vs. AWAY - Dividend Comparison

ONLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while AWAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.04%
ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF	0.36%	0.30%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ONLN and AWAY in my portfolio?

ONLN and AWAY have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ONLN or AWAY?

ONLN has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to AWAY (7.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONLN dropped -71.77% vs AWAY's -56.57%.

Which ETF is better, ONLN or AWAY?

On 5-year performance, ONLN leads with -7.66% vs -10.70% for AWAY. On fees, ONLN is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, AWAY has been the lower-risk option at 7.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ONLN or AWAY?

Over the 5-year period, ONLN has performed better with a -7.66% return vs -10.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ONLN or AWAY?

ONLN is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AWAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ONLN or AWAY?

ONLN has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for AWAY.

What is the main difference between ONLN and AWAY?

ONLN tracks ProShares Online Retail Index, while AWAY tracks Prime Travel Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for ONLN and 0.75% for AWAY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ONLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.