ONEO vs. IBID
ONEO (SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ONEO is a Momentum fund tracking the Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ONEO returned 27.05% vs 3.54% for IBID. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ONEO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.
Performance
ONEO vs. IBID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONEO achieves a 21.51% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 2.35% return.
ONEO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- 6M
- 14.97%
- YTD
- 21.51%
- 1Y
- 27.05%
- 3Y*
- 18.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.76%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.72%
IBID
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 3.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $833.66K | $776.63K | $746.99K | |
| $100.90K | $72.64K | $61.27K |
ONEO vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEO SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF | 21.51% | 10.61% | 15.01% | 7.93% |
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 2.35% | 5.66% | 4.71% | 2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONEO and IBID is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | 0.03 |
The correlation between ONEO and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONEO vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank
ONEO
IBID
ONEO vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ONEO | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.66 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 6.46 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.72 | 22.66 | -7.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ONEO vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONEO drawdown since its inception was -40.86%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEO and IBID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONEO | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.86% | -1.28% | -39.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.37% | -0.55% | -6.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -0.14% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -0.22% | -4.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 0.16% | +1.68% |
Volatility
ONEO vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.32%. This indicates that ONEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONEO | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 0.32% | +2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 0.92% | +9.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.23% | 1.15% | +12.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 2.21% | +14.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.61% | 2.21% | +16.40% |
ONEO vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONEO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ONEO vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison
ONEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than IBID's 4.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 4.90% | 4.43% | 4.24% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ONEO SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.30% | 1.56% | 1.73% | 1.19% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 7.69% | 1.82% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ONEO and IBID have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ONEO has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to IBID (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEO dropped -40.86% vs IBID's -1.28%.
On 1-year performance, ONEO leads with 27.05% vs 3.54% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ONEO has performed better with a 27.05% return vs 3.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ONEO.
IBID has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 1.16% for ONEO.
ONEO is categorized as Momentum, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. ONEO tracks Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index, while IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEO and 0.10% for IBID.
IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ONEO and IBID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer