PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEH vs. QBUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEH vs. QBUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Equity Hedge ETF (ONEH) and TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ONEH

1D
0.04%
1M
0.20%
6M
-1.04%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

QBUL

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.23%
6M
1.38%
YTD
1.06%
1Y
3.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$75.57K$59.30K$74.10K
$20.26K$33.70K$366.76K

ONEH vs. QBUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ONEH and QBUL is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2026

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEH vs. QBUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ONEH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QBUL
QBUL Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
QBUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBUL Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
QBUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBUL Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ONEH vs. QBUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Equity Hedge ETF (ONEH) and TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ONEHQBULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.90

ONEH vs. QBUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ONEH vs. QBUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEH drawdown since its inception was -3.55%, which is greater than QBUL's maximum drawdown of -2.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEH and QBUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEHQBULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-2.45%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-1.70%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.50%

-1.01%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

Volatility

ONEH vs. QBUL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEHQBULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.04%

3.86%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.04%

3.87%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.04%

3.87%

+1.17%

ONEH vs. QBUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ONEH and QBUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

ONEH vs. QBUL - Dividend Comparison

ONEH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QBUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.85%.


PositionTTM20252024
ONEH
TrueShares Equity Hedge ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QBUL
TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF
8.85%8.94%1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


ONEH and QBUL have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ONEH and QBUL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

QBUL has the higher dividend yield at 8.85%, compared with 0.00% for ONEH.

ONEH is categorized as Equity Hedged, while QBUL is Options Trading.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEH and QBUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer