ONEH vs. ADME
ONEH (TrueShares Equity Hedge ETF) and ADME (Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. ONEH is actively managed, while ADME is passively managed. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
ONEH vs. ADME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ONEH
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ADME
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 6.23%
- YTD
- 7.79%
- 1Y
- 14.94%
- 3Y*
- 14.51%
- 5Y*
- 6.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $772.09K | $556.48K | $715.52K | |
| $75.57K | $59.30K | $74.10K |
ONEH vs. ADME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ONEH TrueShares Equity Hedge ETF | -1.24% |
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 5.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONEH and ADME is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2026 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONEH vs. ADME — Risk / Return Rank
ONEH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ADME
ONEH vs. ADME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Equity Hedge ETF (ONEH) and Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ONEH | ADME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.79 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.77 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ONEH vs. ADME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONEH drawdown since its inception was -3.55%, smaller than the maximum ADME drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEH and ADME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONEH | ADME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -27.49% | +23.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -2.55% | +1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -7.83% | +6.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.98% | — |
Volatility
ONEH vs. ADME - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONEH | ADME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.04% | 11.07% | -6.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 13.03% | -7.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 14.45% | -9.41% |
ONEH vs. ADME - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ONEH and ADME have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
ONEH vs. ADME - Dividend Comparison
ONEH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ADME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 0.36% | 0.38% | 0.47% | 0.78% | 0.73% | 0.26% | 0.41% | 0.70% | 0.86% | 0.32% | 0.69% |
ONEH TrueShares Equity Hedge ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ONEH and ADME have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ONEH and ADME have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
ADME has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for ONEH.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Aptus.
Find the right allocation for ONEH and ADME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer