ONEB.TO vs. CEQT.TO
ONEB.TO (CI North American Core Plus Bond ETF) and CEQT.TO (CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ONEB.TO is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by CI, while CEQT.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ONEB.TO returned 4.53%/yr vs 22.66%/yr for CEQT.TO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ONEB.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONEB.TO achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than CEQT.TO's 14.27% return.
ONEB.TO
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 2.81%
- 3Y*
- 4.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.83%
- 10Y*
- —
CEQT.TO
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 14.27%
- 6M
- 13.93%
- 1Y
- 29.87%
- 3Y*
- 22.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ONEB.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEB.TO CI North American Core Plus Bond ETF | 1.50% | 2.57% | 5.27% | 2.92% |
CEQT.TO CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF | 14.27% | 18.84% | 27.38% | 6.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONEB.TO and CEQT.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2023 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONEB.TO vs. CEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ONEB.TO
CEQT.TO
ONEB.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI North American Core Plus Bond ETF (ONEB.TO) and CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ONEB.TO | CEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.88 | -0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 4.15 | -2.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.86 | 16.41 | -12.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ONEB.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONEB.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.25%, smaller than the maximum CEQT.TO drawdown of -14.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEB.TO and CEQT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONEB.TO | CEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.25% | -14.02% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.79% | -7.26% | +5.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.79% | -14.02% | +12.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.44% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.03% | -1.18% | -0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 1.83% | -1.10% |
Volatility
ONEB.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI North American Core Plus Bond ETF (ONEB.TO) is 0.81%, while CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that ONEB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONEB.TO | CEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.81% | 4.14% | -3.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.14% | 9.22% | -7.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87% | 11.02% | -8.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.45% | 13.08% | -9.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.43% | 13.08% | -7.65% |
Dividends
ONEB.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison
ONEB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than CEQT.TO's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEQT.TO CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF | 1.09% | 1.25% | 1.82% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ONEB.TO CI North American Core Plus Bond ETF | 2.94% | 2.48% | 2.73% | 2.74% | 2.72% | 1.89% | 2.60% | 2.14% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ONEB.TO and CEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ONEB.TO is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while CEQT.TO is Diversified Portfolio.
Find the right allocation for ONEB.TO and CEQT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer