PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONDS vs. ZETA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ONDS vs. ZETA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS) and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONDS achieves a -2.56% return, which is significantly higher than ZETA's -2.85% return.


ONDS

1D
1.93%
1M
-10.45%
YTD
-2.56%
6M
23.67%
1Y
422.53%
3Y*
109.79%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*

ZETA

1D
-2.18%
1M
15.01%
YTD
-2.85%
6M
13.04%
1Y
62.58%
3Y*
29.75%
5Y*
18.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONDS vs. ZETA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ONDS
Ondas Holdings Inc.
-2.56%281.25%67.32%-3.77%-76.30%-19.16%
ZETA
Zeta Global Holdings Corp.
-2.85%13.12%103.97%7.96%-2.97%-6.55%

Correlation

The correlation between ONDS and ZETA is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2021

0.27

Fundamentals

EPS

ONDS:

$1.54

ZETA:

-$0.14

PS Ratio

ONDS:

15.56

ZETA:

2.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

ONDS:

$96.60M

ZETA:

$1.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ONDS:

$43.33M

ZETA:

$881.70M

EBITDA (TTM)

ONDS:

-$75.39M

ZETA:

$50.09M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONDS vs. ZETA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONDS
ONDS Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ONDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONDS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ONDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONDS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ZETA
ZETA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ZETA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZETA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZETA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ZETA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZETA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONDS vs. ZETA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS) and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ONDSZETADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.20

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.98

1.56

+6.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.70

3.16

+14.54

ONDS vs. ZETA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONDS Sharpe Ratio is 3.37, which is higher than the ZETA Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONDS and ZETA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ONDS vs. ZETA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONDS drawdown since its inception was -98.28%, which is greater than ZETA's maximum drawdown of -70.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONDS and ZETA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONDSZETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.28%

-70.01%

-28.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.37%

-40.37%

-13.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-83.28%

-70.01%

-13.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.99%

-70.01%

-26.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.23%

-46.19%

-5.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.40%

-34.13%

-37.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.10%

19.85%

+4.25%

Volatility

ONDS vs. ZETA - Volatility Comparison

Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS) has a higher volatility of 36.79% compared to Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) at 24.86%. This indicates that ONDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZETA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONDSZETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

36.79%

24.86%

+11.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

77.89%

48.84%

+29.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

126.76%

73.75%

+53.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.81%

72.06%

+41.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

120.70%

72.06%

+48.64%

Dividends

ONDS vs. ZETA - Dividend Comparison

Neither ONDS nor ZETA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ONDS vs. ZETA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ondas Holdings Inc. and Zeta Global Holdings Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
50.12M
396.30M
(ONDS) Total Revenue
(ZETA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ONDS and ZETA have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONDS has higher volatility (36.79%) compared to ZETA (24.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONDS dropped -98.28% vs ZETA's -70.01%.

ONDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONDS and ZETA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer