ONDG vs. LABU
ONDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ONDS Daily ETF) and LABU (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - ONDG tracks the Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS) while LABU tracks the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ONDG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for LABU.
Performance
ONDG vs. LABU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ONDG
- 1D
- -2.99%
- 1M
- -7.08%
- 6M
- -71.57%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
LABU
- 1D
- -8.60%
- 1M
- -25.06%
- 6M
- 37.10%
- YTD
- 42.67%
- 1Y
- 272.05%
- 3Y*
- 25.64%
- 5Y*
- -26.71%
- 10Y*
- -12.33%
- ALL TIME*
- -20.62%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $76.19M | $116.75M | $118.31M | |
| $9.09M | $6.83M | $8.54M |
ONDG vs. LABU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ONDG Leverage Shares 2X Long ONDS Daily ETF | -84.22% |
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | 37.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONDG and LABU is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONDG vs. LABU — Risk / Return Rank
ONDG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LABU
ONDG vs. LABU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ONDS Daily ETF (ONDG) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ONDG | LABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 9.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 23.05 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ONDG vs. LABU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONDG drawdown since its inception was -87.92%, smaller than the maximum LABU drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONDG and LABU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONDG | LABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.92% | -99.18% | +11.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -30.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -78.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -97.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.07% | -94.97% | +9.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.62% | -81.83% | +20.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.97% | — |
Volatility
ONDG vs. LABU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONDG | LABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 24.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 63.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 203.85% | 80.28% | +123.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 203.85% | 96.01% | +107.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 203.85% | 95.22% | +108.63% |
ONDG vs. LABU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONDG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LABU's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
ONDG vs. LABU - Dividend Comparison
ONDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | 0.45% | 0.84% | 0.35% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.64% | 0.17% |
ONDG Leverage Shares 2X Long ONDS Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ONDG and LABU have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ONDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ONDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for LABU.
LABU has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.00% for ONDG.
ONDG tracks Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS), while LABU tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ONDG and 0.96% for LABU.
Find the right allocation for ONDG and LABU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer