OMAH vs. WNTR

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OMAH returned 16.77% vs 106.92% for WNTR. Their -0.21 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. OMAH charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

OMAH vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with OMAH having a 10.47% return and WNTR slightly higher at 10.51%.

OMAH

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: 1.74%
• 6M: 10.80%
• YTD: 10.47%
• 1Y: 16.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.23%

WNTR

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 7.89%
• 6M: 8.31%
• YTD: 10.51%
• 1Y: 106.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 47.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	$19.69M	$17.11M	$16.49M
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF	$3.92M	$3.66M	$3.95M

OMAH vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	10.47%	5.65%
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF	10.51%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between OMAH and WNTR is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.21

Return for Risk

OMAH vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 87
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 82
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 88

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 69
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 71
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OMAH vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OMAH	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	1.97	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	2.27	+0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.30	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.71	2.52	+3.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.71	6.38	+7.33

OMAH vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMAH Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMAH and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OMAH vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMAH drawdown since its inception was -11.83%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMAH and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	OMAH	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.83%	-42.65%	+30.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.95%	-42.65%	+39.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	-9.84%	+9.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.23%	-20.15%	+18.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.23%	16.83%	-15.60%

Volatility

OMAH vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) is 3.01%, while YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 13.00%. This indicates that OMAH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OMAH	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.01%	13.00%	-9.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.93%	47.22%	-41.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.36%	54.66%	-46.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.84%	53.34%	-40.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.84%	53.34%	-40.50%

OMAH vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

OMAH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

OMAH vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

OMAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.89%, less than WNTR's 107.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	14.89%	12.86%
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF	107.26%	58.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OMAH and WNTR in my portfolio?

OMAH and WNTR have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OMAH or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (13.00%) compared to OMAH (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMAH dropped -11.83% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, OMAH or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 106.92% vs 16.77% for OMAH. On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OMAH or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 106.92% return vs 16.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OMAH or WNTR?

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OMAH or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 107.26%, compared with 14.89% for OMAH.

What is the main difference between OMAH and WNTR?

They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OMAH and 1.00% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OMAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.