OMAH vs. IPDP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. OMAH charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.

Performance

OMAH vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

OMAH

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 4.56%
• 6M: 4.00%
• 1Y: 11.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPDP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OMAH vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	2.98%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%

OMAH vs. IPDP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OMAH	IPDP
Financial Services	38.9%	18.6%
Consumer Defensive	16.2%	3.9%
Technology	13.6%	13.1%
Energy	10.5%	-
Communication Services	9.8%	-
Healthcare	7.0%	13.6%
Consumer Cyclical	4.1%	3.6%
Basic Materials	-	1.5%
Industrials	-	45.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

OMAH vs. IPDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 49
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 37
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OMAH vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OMAH	IPDP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.82	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.48	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OMAH	IPDP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	—	—

Drawdowns

OMAH vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMAH drawdown since its inception was -11.83%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMAH and IPDP.

Drawdown Indicators

	OMAH	IPDP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.83%	0.00%	-11.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.65%	0.00%	-2.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.26%	0.00%	-1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.21%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	OMAH	IPDP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.93%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.49%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.05%	0.00%	+8.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.21%	0.00%	+13.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.21%	0.00%	+13.21%

OMAH vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

OMAH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

OMAH vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison

OMAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.44%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%	0.00%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.44%	12.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, OMAH or IPDP?

On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, OMAH or IPDP?

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OMAH or IPDP?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

What is the main difference between OMAH and IPDP?

They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OMAH and 1.52% for IPDP.