PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OMAH vs. BTYB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OMAH vs. BTYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and VistaShares BitBonds 5 Yr Enhanced Weekly Distribution ETF (BTYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


OMAH

1D
-0.70%
1M
0.44%
YTD
4.56%
6M
4.00%
1Y
11.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BTYB

1D
-0.59%
1M
-3.38%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OMAH vs. BTYB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OMAH and BTYB is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OMAH vs. BTYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMAH
OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

BTYB
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OMAH vs. BTYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and VistaShares BitBonds 5 Yr Enhanced Weekly Distribution ETF (BTYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OMAHBTYBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.48

OMAH vs. BTYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OMAHBTYBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

-0.81

+1.51

Drawdowns

OMAH vs. BTYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMAH drawdown since its inception was -11.83%, which is greater than BTYB's maximum drawdown of -3.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMAH and BTYB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OMAHBTYBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.83%

-3.99%

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-3.99%

+1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.26%

-0.98%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

Volatility

OMAH vs. BTYB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OMAHBTYBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.05%

8.71%

-0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

8.71%

+4.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.21%

8.71%

+4.50%

OMAH vs. BTYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

OMAH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BTYB's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

OMAH vs. BTYB - Dividend Comparison

OMAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.44%, more than BTYB's 2.70% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


OMAH and BTYB have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BTYB is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BTYB is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 2.70% for BTYB.

Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OMAH and 0.52% for BTYB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OMAH and BTYB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer