BTYB vs. QUSA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BTYB (VistaShares BitBonds 5 Yr Enhanced Weekly Distribution ETF) and QUSA (VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from VistaShares. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTYB charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QUSA.

Performance

BTYB vs. QUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares BitBonds 5 Yr Enhanced Weekly Distribution ETF (BTYB) and VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF (QUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BTYB

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -3.17%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QUSA

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: -0.43%
• YTD: 8.69%
• 6M: 8.33%
• 1Y: 5.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTYB vs. QUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BTYB VistaShares BitBonds 5 Yr Enhanced Weekly Distribution ETF	-3.75%
QUSA VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF	6.11%

Correlation

The correlation between BTYB and QUSA is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026	0.66

Return for Risk

BTYB vs. QUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTYB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QUSA

QUSA Risk / Return Rank: 15
QUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
QUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
QUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 15
QUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
QUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTYB vs. QUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares BitBonds 5 Yr Enhanced Weekly Distribution ETF (BTYB) and VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF (QUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTYB	QUSA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.47	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.75	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.09	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.50	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.19	—

Drawdowns

BTYB vs. QUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTYB drawdown since its inception was -5.64%, smaller than the maximum QUSA drawdown of -10.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTYB and QUSA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTYB	QUSA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.64%	-10.64%	+5.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.66%	-1.82%	-2.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	-3.72%	+1.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.23%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BTYB	QUSA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.79%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.65%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.87%	10.78%	-1.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.87%	10.64%	-1.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.87%	10.64%	-1.77%

BTYB vs. QUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTYB has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than QUSA's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTYB vs. QUSA - Dividend Comparison

BTYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than QUSA's 12.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BTYB VistaShares BitBonds 5 Yr Enhanced Weekly Distribution ETF	3.04%	0.00%
QUSA VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF	12.60%	6.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTYB and QUSA in my portfolio?

BTYB and QUSA have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BTYB or QUSA?

On fees, BTYB is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTYB or QUSA?

BTYB is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QUSA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTYB or QUSA?

QUSA has the higher dividend yield at 12.60%, compared with 3.04% for BTYB.

What is the main difference between BTYB and QUSA?

Their fees differ too: 0.52% for BTYB and 0.95% for QUSA.