BTYB vs. QUSA
BTYB (VistaShares BitBonds 5 Yr Enhanced Weekly Distribution ETF) and QUSA (VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from VistaShares. Both are actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTYB charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QUSA.
Performance
BTYB vs. QUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BTYB
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUSA
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- 9.83%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 3.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTYB vs. QUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BTYB VistaShares BitBonds 5 Yr Enhanced Weekly Distribution ETF | -2.35% |
QUSA VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF | 8.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTYB and QUSA is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTYB vs. QUSA — Risk / Return Rank
BTYB
QUSA
BTYB vs. QUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares BitBonds 5 Yr Enhanced Weekly Distribution ETF (BTYB) and VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF (QUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTYB | QUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.81 | 0.57 | -1.38 |
Drawdowns
BTYB vs. QUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTYB drawdown since its inception was -3.99%, smaller than the maximum QUSA drawdown of -10.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTYB and QUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTYB | QUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -10.64% | +6.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.99% | 0.00% | -3.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.98% | -3.85% | +2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.25% | — |
Volatility
BTYB vs. QUSA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTYB | QUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.71% | 10.35% | -1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.71% | 10.35% | -1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.71% | 10.35% | -1.64% |
BTYB vs. QUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTYB has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than QUSA's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTYB vs. QUSA - Dividend Comparison
BTYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than QUSA's 12.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BTYB VistaShares BitBonds 5 Yr Enhanced Weekly Distribution ETF | 2.70% | 0.00% |
QUSA VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF | 12.47% | 6.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTYB and QUSA have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BTYB is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTYB is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QUSA.
QUSA has the higher dividend yield at 12.47%, compared with 2.70% for BTYB.
Their fees differ too: 0.52% for BTYB and 0.95% for QUSA.
Find the right allocation for BTYB and QUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer