OMAH vs. BRKW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) and BRKW (Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OMAH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BRKW.

Performance

OMAH vs. BRKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OMAH achieves a 5.13% return, which is significantly higher than BRKW's -6.96% return.

OMAH

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 5.13%
• 6M: 5.28%
• 1Y: 12.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BRKW

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 3.11%
• YTD: -6.96%
• 6M: -7.41%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OMAH vs. BRKW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	5.13%	7.19%
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	-6.96%	2.09%

Correlation

The correlation between OMAH and BRKW is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025	0.54

OMAH vs. BRKW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OMAH	BRKW
Financial Services	38.9%	7.4%
Consumer Defensive	16.2%	-
Technology	13.6%	-
Energy	10.5%	-
Communication Services	9.8%	-
Healthcare	7.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

OMAH vs. BRKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 54
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 43
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OMAH vs. BRKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OMAH	BRKW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.12	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.16	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OMAH	BRKW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	-0.30	+1.04

Drawdowns

OMAH vs. BRKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMAH drawdown since its inception was -11.83%, smaller than the maximum BRKW drawdown of -12.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMAH and BRKW.

Drawdown Indicators

	OMAH	BRKW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.83%	-12.64%	+0.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.12%	-9.92%	+7.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.26%	-5.36%	+4.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.22%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	OMAH	BRKW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.99%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.50%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.06%	17.22%	-9.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.20%	17.22%	-4.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.20%	17.22%	-4.02%

OMAH vs. BRKW - Expense Ratio Comparison

OMAH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BRKW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

OMAH vs. BRKW - Dividend Comparison

OMAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.36%, less than BRKW's 24.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	24.97%	14.45%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.36%	12.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OMAH and BRKW in my portfolio?

OMAH and BRKW have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, OMAH or BRKW?

On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, OMAH or BRKW?

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BRKW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OMAH or BRKW?

BRKW has the higher dividend yield at 24.97%, compared with 15.36% for OMAH.

What is the main difference between OMAH and BRKW?

They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OMAH and 0.99% for BRKW.