OMAH vs. BRKW

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) and BRKW (Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OMAH returned 11.30% vs -3.41% for BRKW. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OMAH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BRKW.

Performance

OMAH vs. BRKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OMAH achieves a 5.24% return, which is significantly higher than BRKW's -5.09% return.

OMAH

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: -1.54%
• YTD: 5.24%
• 6M: 4.79%
• 1Y: 11.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BRKW

• 1D: -1.72%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: -5.09%
• 6M: -4.87%
• 1Y: -3.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OMAH vs. BRKW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	5.24%	7.02%
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	-5.09%	1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between OMAH and BRKW is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.55

The correlation between OMAH and BRKW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

OMAH vs. BRKW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OMAH	BRKW
Financial Services	37.3%	7.8%
Communication Services	19.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	13.2%	-
Technology	11.6%	-
Energy	8.8%	-
Industrials	4.9%	-
Healthcare	4.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

OMAH vs. BRKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 54
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 43
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 58

BRKW

BRKW Risk / Return Rank: 7
BRKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
BRKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
BRKW Omega Ratio Rank: 7
BRKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
BRKW Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OMAH vs. BRKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OMAH	BRKW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	-0.20	+1.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	-0.16	+2.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	0.98	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.78	-0.27	+4.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.91	-0.54	+9.46

OMAH vs. BRKW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMAH Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the BRKW Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMAH and BRKW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OMAH vs. BRKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMAH drawdown since its inception was -11.83%, smaller than the maximum BRKW drawdown of -12.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMAH and BRKW.

Drawdown Indicators

	OMAH	BRKW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.83%	-12.64%	+0.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.00%	-12.64%	+9.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.02%	-8.12%	+6.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.27%	-5.47%	+4.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.27%	6.27%	-5.00%

Volatility

OMAH vs. BRKW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) is 2.21%, while Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that OMAH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OMAH	BRKW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.21%	4.69%	-2.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.59%	12.75%	-7.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.03%	17.21%	-9.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.99%	17.16%	-4.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.99%	17.16%	-4.17%

OMAH vs. BRKW - Expense Ratio Comparison

OMAH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BRKW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

OMAH vs. BRKW - Dividend Comparison

OMAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.06%, less than BRKW's 25.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	25.75%	14.45%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	14.06%	12.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OMAH and BRKW in my portfolio?

OMAH and BRKW have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OMAH or BRKW?

BRKW has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to OMAH (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMAH dropped -11.83% vs BRKW's -12.64%.

Which ETF is better, OMAH or BRKW?

On 1-year performance, OMAH leads with 11.30% vs -3.41% for BRKW. On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OMAH or BRKW?

Over the 1-year period, OMAH has performed better with a 11.30% return vs -3.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OMAH or BRKW?

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BRKW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OMAH or BRKW?

BRKW has the higher dividend yield at 25.75%, compared with 14.06% for OMAH.

What is the main difference between OMAH and BRKW?

They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OMAH and 0.99% for BRKW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OMAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.