PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OM3M.DE vs. UEFI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OM3M.DE vs. UEFI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7 UCITS ETF USD Dist (OM3M.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEFI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OM3M.DE achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than UEFI.DE's 1.01% return.


OM3M.DE

1D
0.06%
1M
0.70%
YTD
0.54%
6M
-0.18%
1Y
1.18%
3Y*
0.55%
5Y*
1.05%
10Y*

UEFI.DE

1D
0.03%
1M
0.75%
YTD
1.01%
6M
0.40%
1Y
0.89%
3Y*
-0.59%
5Y*
-0.43%
10Y*
0.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OM3M.DE vs. UEFI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
OM3M.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7 UCITS ETF USD Dist
0.54%-4.89%7.50%0.56%-3.84%5.66%-2.73%8.28%4.00%
UEFI.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.01%-5.01%4.87%-0.30%-9.82%4.88%-0.27%10.89%4.65%

Correlation

The correlation between OM3M.DE and UEFI.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2018

0.86

The correlation between OM3M.DE and UEFI.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.86 (all time) to 0.96 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OM3M.DE vs. UEFI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OM3M.DE
OM3M.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
OM3M.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OM3M.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
OM3M.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
OM3M.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
OM3M.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

UEFI.DE
UEFI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
UEFI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OM3M.DE vs. UEFI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7 UCITS ETF USD Dist (OM3M.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEFI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OM3M.DEUEFI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.07

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

0.05

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.51

0.08

+0.43

OM3M.DE vs. UEFI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OM3M.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is higher than the UEFI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OM3M.DE and UEFI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OM3M.DEUEFI.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

0.04

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

-0.03

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

-0.00

+0.25

Drawdowns

OM3M.DE vs. UEFI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OM3M.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.79%, smaller than the maximum UEFI.DE drawdown of -32.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OM3M.DE and UEFI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OM3M.DEUEFI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.79%

-32.63%

+18.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.06%

-16.26%

+12.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.94%

-16.26%

+6.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.25%

-16.26%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.74%

-17.90%

+10.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.62%

-14.47%

+7.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

10.93%

-9.30%

Volatility

OM3M.DE vs. UEFI.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7 UCITS ETF USD Dist (OM3M.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEFI.DE) at 0.74%. This indicates that OM3M.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEFI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OM3M.DEUEFI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

0.74%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.63%

3.69%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.25%

21.96%

-16.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.56%

13.03%

-5.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.18%

16.60%

-9.42%

OM3M.DE vs. UEFI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

OM3M.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than UEFI.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

OM3M.DE vs. UEFI.DE - Dividend Comparison

OM3M.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than UEFI.DE's 2.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OM3M.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7 UCITS ETF USD Dist
3.38%3.78%3.19%2.59%1.31%0.83%1.81%2.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UEFI.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
2.64%1.93%2.25%2.54%1.33%0.82%1.66%1.68%2.29%1.74%0.76%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, OM3M.DE and UEFI.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, UEFI.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UEFI.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for OM3M.DE.

OM3M.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 3-7 Year Bond Index, while UEFI.DE tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for OM3M.DE and 0.05% for UEFI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OM3M.DE and UEFI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer