OLO vs. COMP

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

OLO (Olo Inc.) and COMP (Compass, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Application industry within the Technology sector. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

OLO vs. COMP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Olo Inc. (OLO) and Compass, Inc. (COMP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

OLO

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COMP

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: -13.07%
• YTD: -28.29%
• 6M: -27.26%
• 1Y: 20.51%
• 3Y*: 29.13%
• 5Y*: -12.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OLO vs. COMP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
OLO Olo Inc.	0.00%	33.59%	34.27%	-8.48%	-69.97%	-20.87%
COMP Compass, Inc.	-28.29%	80.68%	55.59%	61.37%	-74.37%	-54.89%

Correlation

The correlation between OLO and COMP is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021	0.41

The correlation between OLO and COMP shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap OLO : $1.87B COMP : $6.24B
EPS OLO : -$0.00 COMP : $0.02
PS Ratio OLO : 5.95 COMP : 0.58
PB Ratio OLO : 2.64 COMP : 2.21
Total Revenue (TTM) OLO : $314.33M COMP : $8.31B
Gross Profit (TTM) OLO : $167.55M COMP : $893.40M
EBITDA (TTM) OLO : $16.56M COMP : -$177.70M

Return for Risk

OLO vs. COMP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMP

COMP Risk / Return Rank: 53
COMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
COMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
COMP Omega Ratio Rank: 54
COMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
COMP Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OLO vs. COMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Olo Inc. (OLO) and Compass, Inc. (COMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OLO	COMP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.22	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	OLO	COMP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-90.82%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-50.81%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-57.24%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-89.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-62.38%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-66.53%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	23.81%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	OLO	COMP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	19.24%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	50.82%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	63.40%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	79.89%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	79.07%	—

Dividends

OLO vs. COMP - Dividend Comparison

Neither OLO nor COMP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

OLO vs. COMP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Olo Inc. and Compass, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

OLO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olo Inc. reported a gross profit of 43.93M and revenue of 85.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.3%.

COMP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compass, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

OLO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olo Inc. reported an operating income of -2.70M and revenue of 85.72M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.2%.

COMP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compass, Inc. reported an operating income of -351.00M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in an operating margin of -13.0%.

OLO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olo Inc. reported a net income of 1.58M and revenue of 85.72M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.

COMP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compass, Inc. reported a net income of 22.00M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in a net margin of 0.8%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OLO and COMP in my portfolio?

OLO and COMP have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.