PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OLN vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OLN vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Olin Corporation (OLN) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OLN achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, OLN has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 1.20%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.27% annualized return.


OLN

1D
0.55%
1M
-7.69%
6M
-5.58%
YTD
7.11%
1Y
11.12%
3Y*
-23.65%
5Y*
-10.43%
10Y*
1.20%

^GSPC

1D
-0.51%
1M
0.30%
6M
8.49%
YTD
10.05%
1Y
20.28%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
13.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OLN vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OLN
Olin Corporation
7.11%-36.15%-36.29%3.46%-6.63%138.55%50.81%-10.77%-41.88%42.51%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
10.05%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between OLN and ^GSPC is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1987

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between OLN and ^GSPC has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OLN vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OLN
OLN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
OLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
OLN Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
OLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
OLN Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OLN vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Olin Corporation (OLN) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OLN^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.29

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

2.24

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.71

9.71

-9.00

OLN vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OLN Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OLN and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OLN vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OLN drawdown since its inception was -73.80%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OLN and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OLN^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.80%

-56.78%

-17.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.54%

-9.10%

-25.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.26%

-18.90%

-50.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.87%

-25.43%

-46.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.80%

-33.92%

-39.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.08%

-1.00%

-63.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.06%

-10.70%

-14.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.79%

2.09%

+13.70%

Volatility

OLN vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Olin Corporation (OLN) has a higher volatility of 13.91% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.25%. This indicates that OLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OLN^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.91%

3.25%

+10.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.26%

10.00%

+29.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.58%

12.56%

+43.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.08%

17.00%

+28.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.10%

18.05%

+29.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


OLN and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OLN has higher volatility (13.91%) compared to ^GSPC (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OLN dropped -73.80% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OLN and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer