OLMA vs. DFH

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

OLMA (Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and DFH (Dream Finders Homes, Inc.) are both stocks. OLMA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while DFH operates in Residential Construction (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, OLMA returned -17.80%/yr vs -9.68%/yr for DFH. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

OLMA vs. DFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OLMA) and Dream Finders Homes, Inc. (DFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OLMA achieves a -60.00% return, which is significantly lower than DFH's -15.56% return.

OLMA

• 1D: 5.15%
• 1M: -26.90%
• YTD: -60.00%
• 6M: -64.51%
• 1Y: 142.13%
• 3Y*: 8.31%
• 5Y*: -17.80%
• 10Y*: —

DFH

• 1D: -7.44%
• 1M: -1.03%
• YTD: -15.56%
• 6M: -18.88%
• 1Y: -35.36%
• 3Y*: -14.11%
• 5Y*: -9.68%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OLMA vs. DFH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
OLMA Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	-60.00%	328.82%	-58.45%	472.65%	-73.82%	-77.64%
DFH Dream Finders Homes, Inc.	-15.56%	-26.51%	-34.51%	310.28%	-55.48%	-0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between OLMA and DFH is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2021	0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap OLMA : $1.03B DFH : $1.33B
EPS OLMA : -$2.03 DFH : $1.77
PB Ratio OLMA : 2.14 DFH : 1.05
Total Revenue (TTM) OLMA : $0.00 DFH : $4.22B
Gross Profit (TTM) OLMA : -$187.00K DFH : $561.30M
EBITDA (TTM) OLMA : -$197.79M DFH : $234.81M

Return for Risk

OLMA vs. DFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OLMA

OLMA Risk / Return Rank: 79
OLMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
OLMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
OLMA Omega Ratio Rank: 90
OLMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
OLMA Martin Ratio Rank: 72

DFH

DFH Risk / Return Rank: 18
DFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
DFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
DFH Omega Ratio Rank: 17
DFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
DFH Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OLMA vs. DFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OLMA) and Dream Finders Homes, Inc. (DFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OLMA	DFH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	-0.64	+1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	-0.80	+4.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	0.91	+0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	-0.60	+2.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.89	-0.94	+4.83

OLMA vs. DFH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OLMA Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the DFH Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OLMA and DFH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OLMA vs. DFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OLMA drawdown since its inception was -96.26%, which is greater than DFH's maximum drawdown of -75.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OLMA and DFH.

Drawdown Indicators

	OLMA	DFH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.26%	-75.38%	-20.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.35%	-59.44%	-14.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-82.15%	-71.26%	-10.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-93.36%	-71.26%	-22.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.65%	-66.98%	-14.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.99%	-42.00%	-32.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	36.69%	37.58%	-0.89%

Volatility

OLMA vs. DFH - Volatility Comparison

Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OLMA) has a higher volatility of 22.54% compared to Dream Finders Homes, Inc. (DFH) at 15.96%. This indicates that OLMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OLMA	DFH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.54%	15.96%	+6.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.62%	40.27%	+13.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	160.85%	55.28%	+105.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	107.89%	55.24%	+52.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	106.13%	56.97%	+49.16%

Dividends

OLMA vs. DFH - Dividend Comparison

Neither OLMA nor DFH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OLMA and DFH in my portfolio?

OLMA and DFH have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OLMA or DFH?

OLMA has higher volatility (22.54%) compared to DFH (15.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OLMA dropped -96.26% vs DFH's -75.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OLMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.