PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFH vs. ET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DFH vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dream Finders Homes, Inc. (DFH) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFH achieves a -25.20% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 27.95% return.


DFH

1D
-4.12%
1M
-23.82%
6M
-30.45%
YTD
-25.20%
1Y
-49.12%
3Y*
-19.48%
5Y*
-11.19%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-7.36%

ET

1D
0.59%
1M
5.33%
6M
14.36%
YTD
27.95%
1Y
23.30%
3Y*
24.81%
5Y*
25.10%
10Y*
11.35%
ALL TIME*
13.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.07M$9.16M$11.01M
$181.38M$169.96M$202.69M

DFH vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFH
Dream Finders Homes, Inc.
-25.20%-26.51%-34.51%310.28%-55.48%-0.31%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
27.95%-9.37%53.87%27.87%55.74%29.36%

Correlation

The correlation between DFH and ET is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2021

0.16

The correlation between DFH and ET shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DFH:

$1.18B

ET:

$70.06B

EPS

DFH:

$1.52

ET:

$1.35

PE Ratio

DFH:

8.42

ET:

15.09

PS Ratio

DFH:

0.30

ET:

0.82

PB Ratio

DFH:

0.92

ET:

1.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

DFH:

$4.13B

ET:

$89.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DFH:

$368.72M

ET:

$20.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

DFH:

$208.77M

ET:

$13.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFH vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFH
DFH Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
DFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFH Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
DFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFH Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

ET
ET Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ET Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ET Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ET Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFH vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dream Finders Homes, Inc. (DFH) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFHETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.23

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

2.69

-3.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

5.90

-7.11

DFH vs. ET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFH Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFH and ET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFH vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFH drawdown since its inception was -75.38%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFH and ET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFHETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.38%

-87.81%

+12.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.44%

-8.07%

-51.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.26%

-24.56%

-46.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.26%

-24.56%

-46.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.75%

-0.29%

-70.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.44%

-25.58%

-16.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.92%

3.69%

+37.23%

Volatility

DFH vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Dream Finders Homes, Inc. (DFH) has a higher volatility of 21.95% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.35%. This indicates that DFH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFHETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.95%

5.35%

+16.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.65%

12.18%

+33.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.12%

16.29%

+40.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.40%

24.35%

+31.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.47%

34.21%

+23.26%

Dividends

DFH vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

DFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFH
Dream Finders Homes, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
6.56%7.97%6.51%8.95%7.33%7.41%17.27%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%

Financials

DFH vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dream Finders Homes, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

DFH vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dream Finders Homes, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

DFH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Dream Finders Homes, Inc. reported a gross profit of -129.49M and revenue of 1.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -12.2%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 6.62B and revenue of 27.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.

DFH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Dream Finders Homes, Inc. reported an operating income of -19.38M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.8%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.98B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

DFH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Dream Finders Homes, Inc. reported a net income of 27.72M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.25B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DFH and ET have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFH has higher volatility (21.95%) compared to ET (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFH dropped -75.38% vs ET's -87.81%.

ET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFH and ET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer