OLED vs. SHOO
OLED (Universal Display Corporation) and SHOO (Steven Madden, Ltd.) are both stocks. OLED operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while SHOO operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, OLED returned 3.65%/yr vs 9.21%/yr for SHOO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OLED vs. SHOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OLED achieves a -21.27% return, which is significantly lower than SHOO's 12.04% return. Over the past 10 years, OLED has underperformed SHOO with an annualized return of 3.65%, while SHOO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.21% annualized return.
OLED
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- -21.27%
- 6M
- -21.90%
- 1Y
- -41.63%
- 3Y*
- -13.06%
- 5Y*
- -15.40%
- 10Y*
- 3.65%
SHOO
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 20.41%
- YTD
- 12.04%
- 6M
- 7.50%
- 1Y
- 95.49%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 3.06%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
OLED vs. SHOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OLED Universal Display Corporation | -21.27% | -19.07% | -22.88% | 78.64% | -33.87% | -27.89% | 11.91% | 120.74% | -45.69% | 206.97% |
SHOO Steven Madden, Ltd. | 12.04% | 0.63% | 3.21% | 34.62% | -29.52% | 33.46% | -17.43% | 44.42% | -1.19% | 30.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between OLED and SHOO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 1996 | 0.27 |
The correlation between OLED and SHOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
OLED:
$4.32B
SHOO:
$3.32B
OLED:
$4.49
SHOO:
$1.07
OLED:
20.37
SHOO:
43.26
OLED:
6.94
SHOO:
1.25
OLED:
2.53
SHOO:
3.63
OLED:
$626.55M
SHOO:
$2.63B
OLED:
$465.05M
SHOO:
$1.18B
OLED:
$277.56M
SHOO:
$148.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OLED vs. SHOO — Risk / Return Rank
OLED
SHOO
OLED vs. SHOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Display Corporation (OLED) and Steven Madden, Ltd. (SHOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OLED | SHOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.36 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 3.03 | -3.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | 8.12 | -9.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OLED vs. SHOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OLED drawdown since its inception was -85.55%, which is greater than SHOO's maximum drawdown of -77.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OLED and SHOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OLED | SHOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.55% | -77.06% | -8.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.99% | -31.73% | -14.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.74% | -60.21% | -2.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.74% | -60.21% | -2.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.20% | -60.21% | -4.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.04% | -3.07% | -59.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.20% | -22.84% | -22.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.20% | 11.81% | +15.39% |
Volatility
OLED vs. SHOO - Volatility Comparison
Universal Display Corporation (OLED) has a higher volatility of 11.55% compared to Steven Madden, Ltd. (SHOO) at 9.14%. This indicates that OLED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OLED | SHOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.55% | 9.14% | +2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.53% | 30.48% | -0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.98% | 44.24% | -6.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.81% | 39.11% | +4.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.43% | 40.39% | +7.04% |
Dividends
OLED vs. SHOO - Dividend Comparison
OLED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than SHOO's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OLED Universal Display Corporation | 2.02% | 1.54% | 1.09% | 0.73% | 1.11% | 0.48% | 0.26% | 0.19% | 0.26% | 0.07% |
SHOO Steven Madden, Ltd. | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.98% | 2.00% | 2.63% | 1.29% | 0.42% | 1.33% | 1.78% | 0.00% |
Financials
OLED vs. SHOO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Display Corporation and Steven Madden, Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OLED vs. SHOO - Profitability Comparison
OLED - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Display Corporation reported a gross profit of 106.09M and revenue of 142.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.
SHOO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steven Madden, Ltd. reported a gross profit of 357.42M and revenue of 653.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.7%.
OLED - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Display Corporation reported an operating income of 42.75M and revenue of 142.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.1%.
SHOO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steven Madden, Ltd. reported an operating income of 98.74M and revenue of 653.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.
OLED - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Display Corporation reported a net income of 35.90M and revenue of 142.21M, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.
SHOO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steven Madden, Ltd. reported a net income of 71.82M and revenue of 653.10M, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OLED and SHOO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OLED has higher volatility (11.55%) compared to SHOO (9.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OLED dropped -85.55% vs SHOO's -77.06%.
SHOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OLED and SHOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer