OKTG vs. CRWU
OKTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF) and CRWU (T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. OKTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CRWU.
Performance
OKTG vs. CRWU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OKTG achieves a 93.46% return, which is significantly higher than CRWU's -45.03% return.
OKTG
- 1D
- 2.20%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- 6M
- 107.76%
- YTD
- 93.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CRWU
- 1D
- -5.95%
- 1M
- -30.53%
- 6M
- -65.39%
- YTD
- -45.03%
- 1Y
- -83.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -87.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $23.19M | $20.12M | $19.78M | |
| $268.28K | $488.97K | $1.00M |
OKTG vs. CRWU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OKTG Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF | 93.46% | 5.90% |
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | -45.03% | -24.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between OKTG and CRWU is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OKTG vs. CRWU — Risk / Return Rank
OKTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRWU
OKTG vs. CRWU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF (OKTG) and T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OKTG | CRWU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.99 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.20 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OKTG vs. CRWU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OKTG drawdown since its inception was -60.69%, smaller than the maximum CRWU drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OKTG and CRWU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OKTG | CRWU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.69% | -93.88% | +33.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -93.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.69% | -91.79% | +75.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.50% | -68.42% | +45.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 72.23% | — |
Volatility
OKTG vs. CRWU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OKTG | CRWU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 62.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 138.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 130.11% | 194.05% | -63.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 130.11% | 193.12% | -63.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 130.11% | 193.12% | -63.01% |
OKTG vs. CRWU - Expense Ratio Comparison
OKTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CRWU's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
OKTG vs. CRWU - Dividend Comparison
OKTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | 15.48% | 8.51% |
OKTG Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OKTG and CRWU have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OKTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OKTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWU.
CRWU has the higher dividend yield at 15.48%, compared with 0.00% for OKTG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for OKTG and 1.50% for CRWU.
Find the right allocation for OKTG and CRWU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer