OKTG vs. BWET
OKTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OKTG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. OKTG is actively managed, while BWET is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. OKTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.
Performance
OKTG vs. BWET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OKTG achieves a 55.43% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 990.13% return.
OKTG
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 126.83%
- YTD
- 55.43%
- 6M
- 55.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BWET
- 1D
- 11.71%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 990.13%
- 6M
- 857.64%
- 1Y
- 2,014.90%
- 3Y*
- 145.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OKTG vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OKTG Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF | 55.43% | 10.38% |
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | 990.13% | -11.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between OKTG and BWET is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OKTG vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank
OKTG
BWET
OKTG vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF (OKTG) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OKTG | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 20.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 2.01 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
OKTG vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OKTG drawdown since its inception was -60.69%, which is greater than BWET's maximum drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OKTG and BWET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OKTG | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.69% | -56.90% | -3.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -30.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -56.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.19% | -0.90% | -22.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.37% | -24.06% | +0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.51% | — |
Volatility
OKTG vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OKTG | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 28.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 88.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 137.13% | 98.73% | +38.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 137.13% | 70.70% | +66.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 137.13% | 70.70% | +66.43% |
OKTG vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison
OKTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
OKTG vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison
Neither OKTG nor BWET has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
OKTG and BWET have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OKTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OKTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.
OKTG and BWET have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
OKTG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BWET is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for OKTG and 3.50% for BWET.
Find the right allocation for OKTG and BWET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer