OKLL vs. BWET
OKLL (Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OKLL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. OKLL is actively managed, while BWET is passively managed. Over the past year, OKLL returned -73.38% vs 1424.52% for BWET. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. OKLL charges 1.31%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.
Performance
OKLL vs. BWET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OKLL achieves a -64.46% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 968.33% return.
OKLL
- 1D
- -4.03%
- 1M
- -30.54%
- YTD
- -64.46%
- 6M
- -73.01%
- 1Y
- -73.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BWET
- 1D
- -5.48%
- 1M
- 18.43%
- YTD
- 968.33%
- 6M
- 944.72%
- 1Y
- 1,424.52%
- 3Y*
- 123.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OKLL vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OKLL Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF | -64.46% | -25.10% |
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | 968.33% | 42.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between OKLL and BWET is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OKLL vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank
OKLL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BWET
OKLL vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF (OKLL) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OKLL | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.87 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 47.03 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 147.28 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OKLL vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OKLL drawdown since its inception was -96.29%, which is greater than BWET's maximum drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OKLL and BWET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OKLL | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.29% | -56.90% | -39.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.29% | -30.64% | -65.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -56.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.70% | -5.48% | -90.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.40% | -23.76% | -38.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.60% | — |
Volatility
OKLL vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OKLL | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 26.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 89.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 202.78% | 98.57% | +104.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 202.78% | 70.47% | +132.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 202.78% | 70.47% | +132.31% |
OKLL vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison
OKLL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
OKLL vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison
Neither OKLL nor BWET has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
OKLL and BWET have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, BWET leads with 1424.52% vs -73.38% for OKLL. On fees, OKLL is cheaper at 1.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BWET has performed better with a 1424.52% return vs -73.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OKLL is cheaper with a 1.31% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.
OKLL and BWET have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
OKLL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BWET is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for OKLL and 3.50% for BWET.
Find the right allocation for OKLL and BWET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer