OKLL vs. BAMU

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

OKLL (Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OKLL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OKLL returned -91.78% vs 2.79% for BAMU. Their -0.17 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. OKLL charges 1.31%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

OKLL vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF (OKLL) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OKLL achieves a -85.27% return, which is significantly lower than BAMU's 1.48% return.

OKLL

• 1D: -11.47%
• 1M: -49.59%
• 6M: -86.81%
• YTD: -85.27%
• 1Y: -91.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -86.50%

BAMU

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: 1.24%
• YTD: 1.48%
• 1Y: 2.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	$222.62K	$224.46K	$216.88K
OKLL Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF	$32.35M	$38.94M	$91.46M

OKLL vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
OKLL Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF	-85.27%	-25.10%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.48%	1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between OKLL and BAMU is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	-0.17

Return for Risk

OKLL vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OKLL

OKLL Risk / Return Rank: 4
OKLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
OKLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
OKLL Omega Ratio Rank: 6
OKLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
OKLL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 99
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OKLL vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF (OKLL) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OKLL	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.46	4.92	-5.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.50	8.67	-9.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	2.41	-1.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.95	24.21	-25.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.19	96.11	-97.30

OKLL vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OKLL Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OKLL and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OKLL vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OKLL drawdown since its inception was -98.36%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OKLL and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	OKLL	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.36%	-0.36%	-98.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-98.36%	-0.12%	-98.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.22%	0.00%	-98.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.79%	-0.02%	-65.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	77.87%	0.03%	+77.84%

Volatility

OKLL vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF (OKLL) has a higher volatility of 47.19% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.10%. This indicates that OKLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OKLL	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	47.19%	0.10%	+47.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	131.95%	0.35%	+131.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	200.99%	0.58%	+200.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	198.77%	0.85%	+197.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	198.77%	0.85%	+197.92%

OKLL vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

OKLL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

OKLL vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

OKLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
OKLL Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OKLL and BAMU in my portfolio?

OKLL and BAMU have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OKLL or BAMU?

OKLL has higher volatility (47.19%) compared to BAMU (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OKLL dropped -98.36% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, OKLL or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, BAMU leads with 2.79% vs -91.78% for OKLL. On fees, BAMU is cheaper at 1.09% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OKLL or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, BAMU has performed better with a 2.79% return vs -91.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OKLL or BAMU?

BAMU is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for OKLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OKLL or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.00% for OKLL.

What is the main difference between OKLL and BAMU?

OKLL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for OKLL and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.92 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.